Laserfiche WebLink
ending at a private road, and do prefer the layout with the previous proposal, but can make this <br />layout work with the proper signage. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked if the pond would be that large as it takes up a portion of the site <br />that could be used for commercial development. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that would be close to the estimated size, noting that <br />Lennar does not tend to oversize its ponds. <br /> <br />Commissioner Woestehoff asked if the EDA provided input on this proposal. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl noted that this has not gone to the EDA but the economic <br />development department provided input, sharing similar concerns to the last proposal but agreed <br />that this could work and they would like the retail along Highway 10. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the pond is proposed aesthetically or to meet requirements of <br />the City. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that it is a requirement of the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that he would like all of the commercial property to face <br />Highway 10. He stated that the pond could be moved to the back corner, as that location is flexible. <br />He stated that he likes the previous proposal layout rather than this layout. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer agreed that he preferred the last proposal where the retail faced Highway 10. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that accommodations have already been made for this site <br />and does not want to see more changes and would not support moving the pond onto the <br />commercial area. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the previous proposal did not include the pond and a <br />pond would be necessary for stormwater management. She stated that one of the biggest changes <br />was the road layout and where parking should occur. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if there would be one pond for both the residential and commercial uses <br />or whether each use would have its own pond. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that there would most likely be ponding for both uses, <br />as they would most likely develop at separate times. <br /> <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that he would prefer the retail to face Highway 10. <br /> <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ December 3, 2020 <br />Page 10 of 15 <br /> <br />