My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 07/07/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:37:42 AM
Creation date
7/1/2005 2:51:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
07/07/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
197
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate PIam~er Geisler stated they will be ovcned by the current owners of the property, and <br />maintained as they are now in their natural state. <br /> <br />Ms. Finkfiner asked about the price range of the homes. <br /> <br />Mr. Sletncr stated that has not been determined, but noted that one of the developers lives on the <br />property, and will continue to live there. He indicated the homes will not detract from the value <br />of the surrounding homes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked why Kelly Acres is being platted with outlots for future streets, <br />etc. but Rum River Prairie is being looked at in terms of ghost platting. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated Rum River Prairie will also be outlots, but there could be fewer. <br />She indicated the streets could still be platted. <br /> <br />Mike Bcrmis, 8860 168th Avenue, stated he has lived in Ramsey since 1981. He indicated he has <br />a little understanding of things that happened to the City in those years, but he does not see a lot <br />of sense or reasoning on the way this property will develop versus Tiger Meadows that developed <br />last year', l lc stated this seems worse than what they saw in their first Ramsey house on Fluorine <br />Street in the late 1980's, and the development then fs'0ne reason they chose to leave. He <br />indicated they were told then that the development was being laid out in that manner because of <br />sewer and water. <br /> <br />Mr. Bcrmis stated he and his wife commute 25 to 30 miles a day because they do not want to live <br />in a development area. He thinks this will hurt the area, and he has many concerns. He indicated <br />he does not know how this makes sense when they do not know if sewer and water will come in <br />thc next 25 years. He stated he would guess it is a money.issue, but he does not understand the <br />rationale. <br /> <br />Ms. Finkfiner indicated she thought it pretty bold of the developer to say they were going to put a <br />road through her property, and then put an easement to their septic system on her property also. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik explained the developer was doing what code <br />requires. She stated 'they are required by code to show how roads can expand to the north, south, <br />east, and west. <br /> <br />Case #3: <br /> <br />Public Hearing: Request for Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the <br />Proposed Plat of Marigold Pond; Case of Oakwood Land Development <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that Oakwood Land Development has' submitted an <br />application for an amendment to the 2001 Comprehensive .Plan. She stated the request is to <br />change the land use designation from Rural Developing to Low Density Residential on the <br />property on the east side of Highway 47, north of the Boy Scout Camp. She indicated the <br /> <br /> Planning Commission/June 2, 2005 <br /> Page 11 of 22 <br /> <br />P19 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.