Resolution - #05-04-090 - 04/07/2005

Home

10. 1l. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. That the at about from the Applicant is proposing to construct a detached accessory structure that would be set a forty-five (45) degree angle to the home and be approximately seventy (70) feet street and approximately fifty-three (53) from the front property line. That due to the grading of the lot, the accessory structure cannot be positioned so that it is in line with the principal structure without bringing in an inordinate amount of fill. That the proposed accessory structure will meet or exceed the minimum side-yard setback of ten (10) feet. That the property is eligible for 1,664 square feet of accessory building space. That the combined proposed square footage of the attached and detached garages is 1,584, which does comply with current regulations. That the mean gable roof height of the detached garage would not exceed sixteen (16) feet, which does comply with current regulations. That the proposed accessory structure would have stone work and fiber-cement siding to match the exterior finish of the proposed home and would also be built with soffit, fascia, and eave overhang. That the Applicants want to construct this detached accessory structure for storage of personal property, which, by the covenants of the Home Owner's Association, is prohibited from being stored outside. That the Northfork Architectural Review Committee has reviewed this site plan and has approved it. That there are special conditions applying to the Subject Property that do not generally apply to other properties in this zoning district; namely the grading during the initial land development created at least an eight (8) foot vertical drop-off that spans the entire width of the property rear yard to accommodate a home with a walk-out basement. That the special conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. That literal interpretation of the provisions of City Code would deprive the Applicant of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties in the same district, namely the right to have additional garage space on the premises. That if granted, the variance will not permit a use that is prohibited in the PUD District. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. That if granted, the variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to adjacent property. RESOLUTION #05-04-090 Page 2 of 3