Laserfiche WebLink
10/29/2020 State v. Castellano :: 1993 :: Minnesota Court of Appeals Decisions :: Minnesota Case Law :: Minnesota Law :: US Law :: Justia <br />[4] A dissent in Frisby noted that the plain language of the Brookfield ordinance applied to <br />communications "to willing and indifferent recipients as well as to the unwilling." Frisby, <br />487 U.S. at 497, io8 S. Ct. at 2509 (Stevens, J., dissenting). The Town of White Bear <br />represents that it drafted Ordinance No. 63 mindful of Justice Stevens' concern. <br />[5] Appellant argues that the ordinance's use of "occupant" extends its protection to <br />visitors, guests, or even contractors working in a single residential dwelling and other <br />individuals who have a "substantially lessened privacy interest." <br />https://law.justia.com/cases/minnesota/court-of-appeals/1993/c4-93-356.html 12/12 <br />