Laserfiche WebLink
resident in not having someone who is arguably hostile out in <br />2 front all day long. That is the interest frankly that would <br />3 concern me more than worrying about whether the fellow would <br />4 step in front of fifteen mile an hour school bus or something <br />5 like that. <br />6 QUESTION: And that is the interest that Carey spoke <br />7 about, Carey v Brown. <br />MR. FUHRMAN: Well, Carey v. Brown primarily dealt <br />9 with the matter of privacy. <br />10 QUESTION: Yes. <br />tl MR. FUHRMAN: And in fact -- <br />12 QUESTION: Why do you not talk about that. I really <br />13 think a whole lot of us want to hear about this. <br />14 MR. FUHRMAN: We believe that this Court should <br />15 follow its own precedent that it established in the City of <br />1r) Renton case, and protect residential privacies. In <br />17 Carey v. Brown, this Court stated, "Preserving the sanctity of <br />18 the home, the one retreat to which men and women can repair to <br />19 escape from the tribulations of their daily pursuits, is surely <br />20 an important issue. Our decisions reflect no lack of <br />21 solicitude for the right of an individual to be let alone in <br />22 the privacy of a home, sometimes the last citadel of the tired, <br />the weary and the sick." <br />24 QUESTION: Mr. Fuhrman, do you think that the First <br />25 Amendment under that precedent would enable a city to prevent <br />19 <br />Heritage Reporting Corporation <br />(202) 628-4888 <br />