Laserfiche WebLink
door to door solicitation and the actual ringing of the <br />doorbell? <br />3 MR. FUHRMAN: I would say that personally that an <br />4 ordinance to that effect could be constitutionally valid. <br />would have to naturally recognize - <br />6 QUESTION: Do you think that this Court's precedence <br />7 would support your view? <br />R MR. FUHRMAN: First of all, I believe at this time, <br />9 we are not arguing that point of course, and we believe that <br />10 there has been a division among the Circuits on that issue. <br />tl And as tar as the Seventh Circuit is concerned, the Seventh <br />12 Circuit in the Watseka case, had determined that this type of <br />13 activity is unconstitutional. <br />14 QUESTION: I thought that this Court had spoken to <br />15 that issue. <br />16 MR. FUHRMAN: This Court did, because it actually <br />17 confirmed the decision in the Watseka case. <br />18 QUESTION: The Green River ordinance cases, <br />19 Murdock v. Pennsylvania, and Struthers, those are pretty much <br />20 what Justice O'Connor is talking about, too, are they not? <br />21 MR. FUHRMAN: Yes, <br />2 2 <br />QUESTION: What about the Austin case and the City of <br />23 Boston back in 1971. They said that door to door picketing was <br />24 all right, door to door leafleting was all right. <br />25 MR. FUHRMAN: Leafleting. <br />20 <br />Heritage Reporting Corporation <br />(202) 628-4888 <br />