Agenda - Council - 07/12/2005 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Assistant Community Development Director Frolik noted Mr. Deemer is not looking to build on the easement, but he wants to use it in his' density calculation. Board Member Johnson commented that he does not think the County would do road work for six to eight additional units. Motion by Board Member Johnson, seconded by Board Member Brauer to close the public hearing at 7:33 p.m. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Vice Chairperson Lcvine. Voting No: None. Absent: ~ers Johnson, Brauer, and and Watson. Commission Input Board Member Johnson indicated that while he is has suffered with this property, he has a believes if they granted the variance they would have road right-of-way would have to be include to do. He stated unless there were about the precedent they would be settin~:~,..:.~.~ Motion by Board Member Johnson, seC~e: 06- adopting Findings of Fac~:# i'}¢~:'U ~ble Mr. Ben Deemer for a variance Mr. Deemer variance because he He stated in the future he does not want would be conceme'd to adopt Resolution #05- dicant relating to a request from allowable density on the Subject Property with the clarifications 17. That if grani/~d:i~ ilth~ variance that is prohibited in the R-2 Medium Dehs~i:D'['~tfict. 21'.. ' That if gr~ted,-'~he vafian~e~i{1 violate the intent of the Comprehensive PI~. 22. That if gramed?~:~he, variance will grant the Applicams any special privilege that is denied to otheromers of land in the same district. Board Member Brauer commented that he does not remember a case such as t~s that was granted' ia tkepast: Assistant Commun[~ DeveI0Pment Director Frolik stated this is the first of t~s Wpe. Board Member Braue~' St:~ted he agrees with Board Member Johnson that they would be setting a precedent, and would have to do the same thing for every land owner that came in with this request. Board of Adjustment/June 23, 2005 Page 6 of 9 -237-