Laserfiche WebLink
It is anticipated that the extension of sewer and water to Marigold Ponds will cause <br /> construction to occur along the west side of TH 47 from Apple Ridge to Elmcrest <br /> Park. <br />· A bridge over County Ditch 3/66 is required. <br /> A street paving project is pending for the St Francis Blvd frontage road south of <br /> 160th Lane. <br /> <br />The purpose of this case is to focus on a proposed schedule for the goal of getting this trail <br />segment completed. He reviewed the following scheduled proposed by staff: <br /> <br />· Week of June 20th field work be completed to determine the length and <br /> specifications for the bridge. <br />· Week of July 4th - Order quotations for bridge. <br />· July - Complete field work to determine trail alignment and apply for permits if <br /> necessary. .. <br />· August - Construct trail improvements in conjunction with the work being <br /> preformed with the improvements undertaken for Marigold Ponds. <br /> <br />Action: <br /> <br />No Action necessary <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Report on Meeting with Mallard Estates Townhome Association <br />Regarding the Removal of the Argon Street Gated Access <br /> <br />On June 9th Chief Way and City Engineer Jankowski met with the three member board of <br />the Mallard Estates Townhome Association to discuss the issue of removing the gated <br />access across Argon Street. Staff's presentation focused on implementing some temporary <br />street closures and collecting before and after traffic counts to determine the extent of the <br />traffic change. The City would then negotiate with the board to make the traffic <br />modifications permanent. Staff was informed that this issue would need to be put to a vote <br />of the members and that such a proposal would be resoundingly defeated since the <br />residents feel that any additional traffic would be considered intolerable. However the <br />board did feel that that an opportunity for the removal of the gate did exist provided that <br />the alternative did not appear to be a throughway. It was suggested that a narrow passage - <br />might be acceptable. It seemed that a sensitive point with the association is that the <br />existing gate is not very aesthetic and an alternative that would improve the appearance of <br />this area could garner acceptance. The City would also add appropriate signage to .make it <br />clear that this was a private road, however care will need to be taken with regards to the <br />aesthetics of this signage. <br /> <br />At the end of the meeting it was agreed that the City would respond with a specific <br />proposal for remodeling of this access point that the board could present to their members. <br />Such a proposal should include a visual rendering which would emphasize the aesthetics of <br />the proposal. Ultimately staff would like to have the ability to hire a landscape architect to <br />complete a visual rendering to bring back to the board. The cost to hire a landscape <br /> <br />-358- <br /> <br /> <br />