My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 04/08/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Economic Development Authority
>
2021
>
Minutes - Economic Development Authority - 04/08/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 2:47:22 PM
Creation date
5/18/2021 11:02:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Economic Development Authority
Document Date
04/08/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that there are some official steps that will be taken in <br />the coming months to finalize the Highway 10 design vision. He provided an update on the funding <br />secured for the Highway 10 project, noting that included in that plan is payoff of the RALF funds. <br />He noted that the City would make decisions on which properties will be needed and which could <br />be sold. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen asked if the existing ordinance would allow for this signage or whether there <br />would be work to be done. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that this type of sign is currently prohibited and <br />therefore work would need to be done. He commented that it was known from the start that updates <br />would be needed, and this would be the driver to update the language within the code. He <br />confirmed that currently there are no billboards allowed and the existing billboards were <br />established prior to the prohibition and exist as lawful nonconforming uses. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that although this was done as an RFI, all <br />the information on quality and pricing was included and therefore did not believe additional <br />information would be gained by an RFP. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen stated that he would support dropping Lamar, as Member Riley suggested, <br />and confirmed the consensus of the group. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that he is looking for a recommendation <br />from the EDA on how this should move forward. He stated that the EDA could select one vendor <br />or could recommend that staff work with two vendors to move forward. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill stated that the due diligence has been done and would <br />recommend negotiation occur with one vendor. He stated that the recommendation could be based <br />off the information that was supplied and scoring that staff completed, or the EDA could request <br />that both companies provide a presentation to the EDA in order for the group to make a decision. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen asked the contact that staff has had and whether an in-person presentation <br />would be needed. <br /> <br />Economic Development Manager Sullivan commented that he has not met in person but has talked <br />with all three companies on the telephone and is comfortable with them. He stated that the decision <br />would be of the EDA as to whether they would feel that there would be benefit to in person <br />presentations. He stated that even if one vendor is chosen, he did not believe construction would <br />occur this fall as additional work will be needed to select the location and move forward. <br /> <br />Chairperson Steffen asked if this could happen this year based on the work that would be needed. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that he would feel more comfortable with early <br />2022, based on the timing of the Highway 10 project and right-of-way acquisition discussions. <br /> <br />Economic Development Authority/ April 8, 2021 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.