My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/03/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 06/03/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 11:08:45 AM
Creation date
5/28/2021 10:13:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
06/03/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
139
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7.02: Review Sketch Plan for Bacon Property; Case of Bill Boyum <br />Presentation <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl presented the Staff Report asked the Commission to provide <br />feedback on which concept plan to move forward with and develop a formal sketch plan <br />application. <br />Commission Business <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that the applicant's narrative includes two cul-de-sacs, noting that one <br />lies within Nowthen. He recognized that the comments from public safety shows that they prefer <br />the loop but asked if a larger cul-de-sac would accomplish the same things. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that she could bring that idea forward to public safety for <br />review. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that Commissioner Johnson stated that he preferred the 19-lot layout. <br />Commissioner VanScoy referenced the option which would connect to 178th and asked for <br />additional details. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that connection would be challenging as the road would <br />go through the park area that is mostly wetlands. <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that several of the lots appear to be encumbered with <br />floodplain and asked how the developer would intend to handle that. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the floodplain circles the properties and there is upland <br />area. She commented that some fill is allowed in the floodplain with proper measures and <br />mitigation. She stated that the lots could accommodate the area needed for a house pad and <br />well/septic and most likely only the driveways would be within floodplain. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced the nine -lot layout and easements and asked for additional <br />input on whether those would be for roads. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl noted that these are easements that already exist for utilities and <br />would not be used for roads. <br />Commissioner Anderson referenced lots two through five, which would appear to be hard to build <br />on because of the floodplain in that area. He commented that he does not like the 1,500-foot cul- <br />de-sac and asked if a road could be run from the cul-de-sac bulb to 178th to provide a second access <br />to the development. He stated that he does not prefer to have only one way in or out of a <br />development. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.