Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Lindahl stated that the cul-de-sac proposed would meet the City standards but confirmed that <br />if that is the desire, they could work with City staff to satisfy those concerns. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked whether the road would be public or private. <br />Ms. Lindahl stated that as drawn this would be a public street and would meet the 66-foot street <br />right-of-way with a 28 paved rural section street. <br />Commissioner Anderson commented that on the drawing it is shown as 24 feet and he would have <br />concern with the 28-foot width as well. <br />Ms. Lindahl confirmed that the 24-foot shown as an error and that would be 28 feet as required by <br />City standard. She stated that if a wider road is desired, they could work with City staff. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that he would prefer not to have another cul-de-sac that is 1,500 <br />feet in length and would prefer to see another option. <br />Commissioner Anderson agreed. <br />Chairperson Bauer asked if there would be another option for a secondary access that would not <br />go through the park. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the proposal from the applicant would be the only logical <br />option as there is no development on the north or east to connect to and the other areas are <br />surrounded by wetland. <br />Commissioner Gengler commented that she likes that the applicant listened to the input from the <br />neighbors but also acknowledged the concerns of public safety. She stated that she would tend to <br />support this layout because of the difficulties and uniqueness of the lot. <br />Chairperson Bauer noted that some issues and concerns have been raised and the developer should <br />continue to work with staff in attempt to develop something more acceptable before going forward <br />with full plan development. <br />