My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2021
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 06/15/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:33:29 AM
Creation date
6/11/2021 3:31:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/15/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Deputy City Administrator Gladhill confirmed that it is typical when there are multiple properties <br />for development off of collector infrastructure. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced the use of the PIR fund and asked if this would be a loan <br />from the PIR fund and/or appropriate use. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that staff is showing this as a funding source as this is <br />an existing gravel road that would be improved. He noted that there are existing homes that would <br />utilize the road in addition to potential development projects. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the HRA fund would be a more appropriate funding source. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that this would be an eligible funding source but noted <br />that staff would be hesitant to use that fund as it is slated for use with the Riverdale Drive project <br />and Riverstone South. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if this study would be delegated as part of the administrative <br />costs when development projects come forward. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill replied that it would be a contribution towards infrastructure. <br />He stated that there is benefit to the City completing this work rather than having a project engineer <br />submit plans that need revisions and supervision. He stated that if the group wants the costs <br />recouped, it should be noted so that could be built into the development costs. He commented that <br />it could be part of the negotiation with the developers. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she believes it important that the costs are recouped <br />through development. She asked if there is a process that helps the City related to lift stations and <br />how many homes could be served. She asked what the study would tell the City that it would not <br />already know. <br />City Engineer Westby replied that the capacity of a lift station is impacted by a number of factors <br />and provided additional details on the factors specific to this lift station that could have impacted <br />its capacity. He stated that those elements would be reevaluated. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that if the entire system were built it would have <br />been at capacity but because there is a gap in the system, they need to better understand the <br />available capacity. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff asked for clarification on what results the study will provide. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that the City needs to assess the area costs in some <br />manner, and it is critical that the costs be allocated appropriately, as well as how to serve different <br />areas in isolation as development will be phased on different properties. He stated that once the <br />study is completed it typically provides a slightly different design than was included in the <br />Comprehensive Plan which has resulted in cost savings in previous instances. <br />Public Works Committee / April 20, 2021 <br />Page 5 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.