My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 05/11/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2021
>
Minutes - Council - 05/11/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 11:02:41 AM
Creation date
6/18/2021 2:37:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/11/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the abatement occurs would there be testing and whether the <br />property owner would then be responsible for cleanup. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that before and after photos are taken but testing is not <br />completed. She stated that if there was an active oil leak noticed or the condition was bad, the <br />photos could be sent to the MPCA. She stated that the item could come back to the Council if the <br />condition is poor. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she would want to ensure the current property owner <br />is held liable rather than the City or future property owner. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked if the letters are sent via certified mail. He noted that this would <br />be a substantial cost and would want to ensure they were received. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the letters are sent via regular mail and have not <br />been returned. She stated that if desired, the abatement letter could be sent via certified mail or <br />delivered to the property. She stated that the abatement letter would provide 14 days for the <br />applicant to clean up the property on their own. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill provided context on the code enforcement process and how it <br />has evolved. He noted that a prior method of gaming the system was for residents to reject the <br />certified letter, which drug out the code enforcement process. He stated that the abatement notice <br />could be mailed both ways and posted at the property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked if a rejected letter would serve as proof that the City attempted <br />service. <br /> <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that he did not recall as it has been quite some <br />time since a certified letter was sent. He stated that the City attempts to avoid gray area in the <br />instance a case proceeds to court. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman commented that this will be an expensive process and therefore wants <br />to ensure that all attempts at effort are made. <br /> <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that the City is not charged for towing service. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Howell, seconded by Councilmember Musgrove, to Adopt Resolution <br />nd <br />#21-115 Approving Hiring Contractors to Abate Public Nuisance Items from 7471 152 Avenue <br />NW. <br /> <br />A roll call vote was performed: <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman aye <br />Councilmember Woestehoff aye <br />Councilmember Specht aye <br />City Council / May 11, 2021 <br />Page 18 of 20 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.