Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Slctncr stated he doubts the County will allow another access point on Armstrong, but there <br />is m~ opportunity to swing to the north to connect rather than going straight through. <br /> <br />City [~nginccr Jankowski stated the intent is that 171st would either provide access to the property <br />to the west, or go through to Armstrong, depending on the County guidelines. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer asked how the common septic system will be handled with two <br />horn cowncr' s associations. <br /> <br />Mt'. Sletner indicated it will actually function better to have one septic system versus two. He <br />stated there will be a contract for cost sharing, and at the time City sewer and water is available <br />there will be only one system to abandon. <br /> <br />(;omm i ssioncr Brauer asked if they had considered having one homeowner's association. <br /> <br />Mr. Slctncr stated that is being considered. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson noted this is not a public hearing, however he would entertain <br />comments from the audience on this topic. <br /> <br />Jean Jackson, 17251 Armstrong Boulevard, stated the access to the north mentioned goes right <br />through her property, <br /> <br />Mr. Sletncr stated whether the street goes through is up to her as a landowner, but this gives her <br />options, and also gives the City options as they plan for the next 30 or 40 years. <br /> <br />Bob Tomashcvski, indicated he lives north of the property. He stated what he is seeing with <br />Wolverine Street is it extending to his yard, and ending up as a dead end on his property. He <br />indicated hc does not intend to sell his property, so having a road abut it that goes nowhere does <br />not make much sense. He suggested Wolverine Street should be moved to the west and go <br />through Lot 2 of Block 3 instead of dead ending on his property. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated if they make the assumption that outlot will go straight to the <br />north that would be correct. He indicated he thinks the answer is the developer needs to avoid <br />thc large wetland to the north. <br /> <br />Mr. Tomashevski stated it is not really a wetland, just a pond. <br /> <br />(-'it5, f~;ngineer Jankowski indicated with the current wetland conservation act, the area would not <br />be able to bc filled to put the road through. <br /> <br />Vice Chairperson Johnson stated he believes Staff and the developer can take from these <br />comments that the road to the north should be looked at to see if that is the best place for it. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 2, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />