Laserfiche WebLink
demand arriving on it.. Such a situation would result in .long qiteues and extensive delays, <br />or diversion to alternate routes. <br /> <br />Analysis and Mitigation Measures <br /> <br />Each intersection was analyzed by.the criteria listed above. The signaI timings have been <br />optimized ~'or the signalized hxtersections since this would provide 'fl~e best operations 'for <br />each scenario, including the Existing, The 2005 and 2007 analysis year scenarios utilize <br />the current roadway layout. TI'ds current layout has five key intersections of study. The <br />results of the operational analysis 'for 2005 and 2007 are shown in 'fables 5 and 6. The <br />Build condition is the baseline volumes' wilh only the Puke development traffic. The Full <br />Build condition is the baseline volumes with the Pulte Development, Town Center 1, trod <br />the Superstore. <br /> <br />rahlc 5:2005 Operati0nnl A.nalysis <br />[,,tm'section and r,'affi¢ C6,,t,-oi S~e,m'io' P~akHom. { Int;rseeti'~n <br /> ~ Maximt~m 'Deiav- <br /> <br />~}7ms~ro,~g Bird & TH 10/1~9 Existing . AM 2&8-c 89.'}'-(-0.95 <br />Signalized PM 20.0-C 62.7-E-0.82 <br />..... '-I .- . I ., . <br />krmstrong Blv~ & Indust,v Ave NW j Existing AMil N/A 10.5-B-0. I8 <br />Onsignalized PM I t 1.7-B-0A. 2 <br />km~strong ~ DriVe NW' . Existing AM N/A i3,07B-0~'14 <br />Un.g~,rtalized PM <br />{Iph~e Drive NW & 'tH 10/I 69 ] Exi'stJn~ AM N/A 19.9-C-0,59 <br />Unm'gnalizedJ PM 51.4-F-0.57 <br />tlpine Drive NW & Nutria S'~reet NW[ ~x sting AM N/A i ' 9~0-A-0.03 <br />..... f,5~signalized '~ . .' PM . ~. 9. I-A-0.04 <br /> <br />*Delay in seconds per vehicle **Maximum delay, LOS, and v/¢ ratio on any approach and/o'r moveraent <br /> <br />Based on the analysis of existing conditions, the intersection of Alpine Drive NW and TH <br />10 operates at with an unacceptable level of det%: and level of service on the Alpine <br />Drive approach. Signa[izationw0'uld bring all thd movements at the intersection to LOS <br />D or'above, however Wittqt the Iow volume on-Alpine Drive, the intersection would likely <br />m)t meet signal warrants, <br /> <br />· The i'ntersection of TH I0 and Armstrong Boulevard als0 experiences poor level of <br /> service on specific movements. The current configuration'0fta'affic lanes southbour/d <br /> does not provide enough lanes for the high volume of turning vehicles. An additional <br /> southbound left tta'n lane in addition to the curt'eat thru/let~ lane would provide enough <br /> capacity lbr the traffic and bring the LOS for the movement to D or above. All other <br /> intersections analyzed perform well under two-way stop control. <br /> <br />Pulle Homes Developmen! EA W <br />Trqffic Impact Study .,., <br />City of Ram,s'ey, ,4noka County, Minnesota <br /> <br /> page 16 of 24 <br />?repared by; <br />Botton & .Men& lac <br /> <br /> <br />