Laserfiche WebLink
Fable 6:2007 Operational Analysis <br /> <br />Intersection and Truffle Control <br /> <br />Armstrong B lvd & TH 10/169 <br /> Signalized <br /> <br />Unsignallzed <br /> <br />Armsh'ong Bird & Alpine Drive NW <br /> <br /> Unsignnli;ed <br /> <br />Alpine Drive NW & TH 10/169 <br /> ~,SIslgnal~zed <br /> <br />Alpine DriVe NW 84 Nutria Street NW <br /> <br />bS~,vignalized <br /> <br />Scenario <br /> <br />Force.ted <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Peak Hoar <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />Intersection <br />Delay*-LOS <br /> <br />28.8-c <br />21.5-C <br /> <br />· II2.0-F <br /> 130.O-F <br /> <br />Full Build AM 232.9-F <br /> PM 383.6-F <br />Forecasted N/A <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Forecasted <br /> <br />NIA <br /> <br />N/A- <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />BUild AM N/A <br /> PM <br />Full Build N/A <br /> <br />AM' <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br />AM <br /> <br />*Delay in s~conds pr,' vehicle <br /> <br />Forecasted <br /> <br />' [~Uitci." <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />Forecasted [. <br /> <br /> Build <br /> <br />Full Build <br /> <br />AM <br />PM <br /> <br /> AM <br /> PM <br /> AM <br /> <br />· PM <br /> AM. <br /> PM <br /> <br />**Maximum delay, LOS, and <br /> <br />N/A <br /> <br />N/A <br />N/A <br /> <br />Maximum De*'lay~ t <br /> Lq?-v/c* ~' l <br /> 62,%E-0.87 <br /> <br />205,2-F- 1',36 <br />2i0.J-F~ !.o8 <br /> <br />- 349.8-F- 1,67 <br />598.2-F-2,25 <br />1 t.7-B-O,.t 9 <br />12.5-B-0. t2 <br />Unconstrained F <br />Unconstl'alned F <br />Unconstrained F <br />Unconstrained F <br />13,9-B-0.15 <br />'} 7.7-C-0. ! 9 <br />20,2-C-0,27 <br />32.0-D4).48 <br />58.9-F-0}72 <br />3.99.1-F-1.67 <br />20.9-C--0.62' <br />60.7-F-0.60 <br /> <br /> 37.7-E-0,69 <br />. !3 I.~-.F-0.90 <br /> 75. <br /> 103'0.9~F-2.70 <br /> <br />N/A 9.0-A;.0..04 <br /> 9. l-A-0.05. <br />N/A <br /> <br /> 9~6-A-0.05 <br />· 1.0. t-B-0.05' <br /> <br /> N/A 9,.6-A-i3.07 <br /> 10. I-B-0,05 <br />v/c ratio on any approach and/or moveme, nt <br /> <br />W [th 'the area being developed by 2007.and. as. traffic is increased, traffic operations' <br />degrade ali of the intersections aaalyze& Intersections ma>, have to be redesigned with <br />additional capacity and a change ia traffic control to h,'mdle the additional traffic. The <br />intersection of Alpine Drive and TH. 10 does perfoma poorly under all the scenarios, just <br />as in the Existing scenario, Grade separation or si~aiization should be considered to <br />achieve acceptable level of service. <br /> <br />The intersection of Armstrong Boulevard and Alpine Drive does not operate well under <br />the existing stop control, With the large volumes at the intersection from all the <br />movements, a four-way stop controlled int6rsection does not' operate well eithbr. In 6rder' <br /> <br />/'ulte Homes Development-EA W <br />'Trq/fic hnpact Sludy m3]' <br />City of Ramsey, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br /> page 17 ~ 2 4 <br />Prepared by: <br />Botton & Men& lnc <br /> <br /> <br />