Laserfiche WebLink
Brookfield Addition <br />?reliminary Plat Review <br /> <br />2of6 <br /> <br />Density: The R-1 Residential regulations for the MUSA area allow a net density, of 3 units per <br />acre. As submitted, the proposed preliminary plat has a net density of approximately 1.9 units <br /> <br />per acre. <br /> <br />Other Lot Requirements: Troll Brook is a designated tributary oft he Rum River, and is subject <br />to Scenic River and Shoreland Management requirements. Additional lot standards required <br />under these rules include a 75-foot lot width at the OHW of Troll Brook, a 100-foot setback from <br />the OHW, controlled vegetative cutting within this 100-foot setback, and a 25% impervious <br />surface limitation for tots fronting the brook. The preliminary plat complies with all of these <br />standards, with the .exception of the 75-foot lot width requirement as measured at the brook. Staff <br />has had discussions with DN-R Staff, Who explained that the intent of the Shoreland lot width <br />requirement is to ensure that sufficient lot area is provided. Because of the .large lot sizes on the <br />Troll Brook., DNR Staff feels th~ intent of the requiremedt is being met. <br /> <br />The preliminary plat submittal indicates that there is one existing building in the northern part of <br />the plat and several in the southern portion of the plat near 166ta Avenue, It appears that only the <br />existing home on 166th Avenue will remain after platting. All other outbuildings must be <br />removed; City Code does not permit accessory buildings to be located on a parcel separate from <br />the main dwelling. <br /> <br />Landscaping/Tree Preservation Plan: <br />The following comments are offered regarding proposed new landscaping for the plat: · The American Elm should be a variety that is resistant to Dutch Elm Disease. <br /> · Additional screening along Nowthen Blvd should be provided for Lots 1 & 12 Block 1. <br /> · Each lot should have two (2) trees !nstalled;.however, preservation of existing trees can <br /> be credited toward this requirement depending on size, species, and location. While a <br /> number of lots adjacent to the brook appear to have significant tree cover that may be <br /> credited to. ward planting requirements, a more detailed tree preservation plan is needed to <br /> make this determination. <br /> <br />A generalized tree survey has been submitted documenting the number of trees and species on <br />site. Further information, such as identifying specifically which trees will be preserved, thei~ <br />sizes and locations, and where the tree save fencing will be installed, is still required. The <br />conservation easement along the brook should be noted on the tree preservation plan as well. As <br />many trees as possible along and within the vicinity of the brook should be preserved, including <br />those outside the boundary of the conservation easement. During construction of individual <br />homes, all efforts should be made to preserve individual trees wherever feasible. <br /> <br />Tree save fencing is required around all trees or groups of trees to be preserved. The fencing <br />shall include, at a minimum, the entire area beneath the tree canopy, which is known as the <br />critical root zone. No construction activity whatsoever may occur within these areas. Moreover, <br />no construction shall .begin until this fencing has been installed and approved by the City. <br /> <br />38 <br /> <br /> <br />