My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/11/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/11/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:10:17 PM
Creation date
8/8/2005 7:22:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
08/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Johns, Commissioners LaMere, Shryock, Lehman, <br />Olds, and Pontius. Voting No: None. Absent: Ostrum. <br /> <br />COMMISSION BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case #1: Explore Options for a Dog Park <br /> <br />Civil Engineer 17 Linton explained staff has received requests for a dog park from time to time. <br />Dog exercise areas seem to be popular. Three Rivers, Park District, formerly Ffermepin Parks, has <br />established four dog-off leash areas. They require an annual pass or purchase of a daily pass for <br />use. Their sites are typically large, natural areas fenced offlkom the adjacent parks. <br /> <br />There are a number of opportunities available for exercising dogs in a natural setting; several of <br />the natural areas include watef features for swimming. The number of urban parks is limited. <br />One ?ption to consider would be an area enclosed with a decorative wrought iron fence in an <br />urban park setting. 'This'Style of.park is popular in'areas such as Boston and New York. <br /> <br />Staff recommends the commissioners solicit the' oPinion of friends and acquaintances before <br />making a decision on a dog park in Ramsey. Local support is critical to the success of any <br />recreational venture. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton thought they may be able to have one in the Town Center. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman did not know if he would recommend having a dog park within Town <br />Center but he thought it was a good idea because of the density that is coming in to the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Shryock thought they have some of the small-natural areas within one of the <br />Town Center parks; they may be able to put a dog park in there. <br /> <br />Chairperson Jotms knew having water in a dog park is a hug~ benefit. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer H Linton stated having bags for waste and water is a huge benefit. <br /> <br />Commissioner Letunan wondered if they should check at the game fair about what. they could <br />have at the park. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought that may be a little different because those are hunting dogs. <br /> <br />Parks Utilities Supervisor Riverblood thought there were two types of' dog parks. One is a <br />hunting park with water and another is for pet owners to allow the pet to get exercise without <br />worry about the dog getting away and hit by a car or hurt someone. His recommendation would <br />be to continue to explore this and find out What type they would want and if they want a <br />permanent or temporary park. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought they could put a survey at the Kennel or vets for feedback. <br /> <br /> Park and Recreation Commission/July 14, 2005. <br /> Page 2 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.