My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/11/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2005
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 08/11/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/26/2025 3:10:17 PM
Creation date
8/8/2005 7:22:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
08/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
61
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Civil Engineer II Linton did not think they were going to do this at this time because to upgrade a <br />building costs 150 percent more than doing a new building. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought it seemed like extravagant because they already have water and <br />bathrooms at the park in the current building and she did not think they needed to have all the <br />little buildings in one park and not have everything th%, want in one building. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman understood the Lions Club and everything they represent but he <br />wondered if the Lions and the City have looked at any of the options on renovating th5 park <br />center building. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated she talked to the Lions many months ago and they were open to it but' <br />they did not think they had the funds to do it in time. She stated they discussed' looking into this <br />further at the June joint meeting and she was afraid this was getting lost in the'hurry to build this <br />structure. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton noted the other parks that will need buildings in the future. <br /> <br />ChairpersOn Johns did not think they needed two concession stands at Central Park. She would <br />like to see them reconstruct Central Park with the Gun Club developing and expand parking .and <br />the internal drive. She stated her biggest fear is that the new proposed structure will quickly be <br />outdated. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer 1I Linton thought when the Gun Club develops they will be able to 'bring sewer <br />and water into the park for the buildings. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns thought they needed to start centralizing the-concessions and expand the parks <br />more. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton thought they could have multiple groups utilizing the facilities if they <br />are separate. He stated the Counci_l did like the ~oncept 'of haVing a package deal. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns asked how if they add bathrooms and water and sewer, are they going to <br />expand the buildings because it is pushed against the parking lot and the ball field already. She <br />did not think it is the most attractive spot to put the "premierbuilding" in the park. She thought <br />it was a waste when they already have a central building that could be renovated and expanded. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman felt everything was going forth withoUt figuring what all of the options <br />were and not looking into the future for the park. He thought.this was agreat donation and act by <br />the Lions but he could not make a recommendation either way without all of the facts or options. <br /> <br />Chairperson Johns stated this made her very nervous because they may be acting in hast on this. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lehman wondered if this building was discussed and talked about at the City <br />Council level. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/July 14, 2005 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.