Laserfiche WebLink
Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that this is a carryover item and was included <br />because of the intent to sit down with the Planning Commission to discuss that further but noted <br />that it would not have to be included in the plan. <br />Councilmember Specht stated that he would agree with leaving the item in the plan. He noted that <br />the O' Reilly' s project brought forward some concerns that he was not aware of in terms of <br />lowering the sale price to support architectural requirements. He noted that perhaps some <br />architectural requirements could be relaxed in order to get more retailers into The COR. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she views number ten as a review of the plan. She <br />noted that if the intention is to meet with the Planning Commission, it would not necessarily need <br />to be on the plan. She stated that in her opinion the review would include things like parking and <br />how the vision for that has changed. <br />Mayor Kuzma agreed that it would be important to connect with the Planning Commission and <br />get on the same page with the vision. He agreed that the plan has changed since the original vision <br />for The COR. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that if there is not strong consensus to keep the <br />item, he would suggest removing the item from the plan and just move forward with the direction <br />to meet with the Planning Commission. He confirmed the consensus of the Council to remove <br />that item from the Strategic Plan. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced number three and stated that while the action is low, the <br />impact is shown as medium. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill noted that this is an instance where the budget impact would <br />be a cost reduction. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff referenced item 16 and stated that while he appreciates the lower <br />priority, he believes the focus is more on replacement rather than new investments. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that this is a carryover item and staff would be <br />comfortable removing it. He confirmed the consensus of the Council to remove the item. <br />Councilmember Specht asked why number 11 would have a high budget impact. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that this could not be accomplished within the <br />existing staff resources. <br />Councilmember Specht commented that the overall goal is to maintain the properties. He asked if <br />there is an appetite to pursue this or whether the language should be changed. <br />Deputy City Administrator Gladhill commented that staff suggested removing the item if the <br />Council was not prepared but there was a lengthy discussion to keep the item. He noted that this <br />City Council Special Work Session / June 15, 2021 <br />Page 9 of 10 <br />