My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2021
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/23/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 10:48:04 AM
Creation date
11/4/2021 9:26:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/23/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner VanScoy was unsure the City would dictate that would have to be removed. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that if there were a complaint, staff would tell him that <br />pavers are needed along with a $25 permit. She stated that if the parking regulation, as proposed, <br />were exceeded, a conditional use permit or variance would be needed. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he did not see the reason to make homeowners go through that <br />process. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that perhaps additional space is allowed through conditional use <br />permit. He stated that when it gets out of hand and complaints are generated, it becomes an issue. <br />Commissioner Walker referenced a case the Commission recently reviewed related to code <br />enforcement where a neighbor received a violation and then turned in other neighbors because <br />they were mad. He stated that is what he is worried about. He stated that if someone has a <br />junkyard, he supports making that person clean it up. He stated that on the other hand, he has <br />multiple vehicles to complete the work that is necessary on his property and to support his horses. <br />He noted that is not unique when you are in rural Ramsey. He stated that he does support the <br />regulation on smaller lots but would not want the same regulation on larger lots. <br />Commissioner Anderson asked if a pad is designed as a shed or building. He asked if a lean-to <br />shed that vehicles are parked under considered a pad. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that a lean-to would count as a structure. She stated that this <br />would apply to parking pads. She stated that perhaps they start with the regulation on lots under <br />2.5 acres and then complete a review in one year. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked the parking guidelines currently and whether they are by acre. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl reviewed the current parking regulations. <br />Commissioner Walker asked the lot sizes that are creating the current issues. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that there are issues on all sized lots. She stated that there <br />are parking issues on tiny lots, huge lots, and everything between. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that if small lots of account for 75 percent of the problem, it would <br />make sense to deal with that now and leave the larger lots. <br />Commissioner Anderson agreed that they should start small and work their way up. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that the Code currently does not have a limit on parking pads <br />and therefore people are paving and putting down a lot of gravel. <br />Chairperson Bauer stated that when looking at the zoning districts there are districts with 2.5 acre <br />lots but not two acres. He suggested that the regulations apply to 2.5 acre lots and lower, placing <br />Planning Commission/ September 23, 2021 <br />Page 10 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.