Laserfiche WebLink
requirements in conjunction with the lot sizes in the different zoning districts. He summarized that <br />the proposed ordinance is too restrictive, and the Commission would favor regulation of lots 2.5 <br />acres and smaller with no restriction on lots larger than 2.5 acres at this time. <br />Commissioner Walker asked how many vehicles could be parked on a 2.5-acre lot or less. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl replied that six vehicles could be parked outdoors and no limit on <br />indoors. <br />Commissioner Walker commented that he did not believe a 300 square feet would be enough to <br />cover that. It was noted that some of those six vehicles would be parked in the driveway. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that four vehicles parked on a pad would be 1,000 square feet <br />which would be 1/10 of the lot. <br />Commissioner Walker stated that he would like to see 500 square feet. <br />Commissioner VanScoy stated that a standard parking space is nine feet by 18 feet. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl commented that 500 square feet could be a nice round number to <br />start with and see if that works for what people need. She stated that they would still intend to <br />review this in one year to determine if the changes work. <br />Chairperson Bauer summarized the direction of the Commission to allow one pad of 500 square <br />feet on lots of 2.5 acres or less. He stated that staff will bring back the proposed ordinance for <br />review again at the next meeting. <br />Commissioner Dunaway asked if there would be anything regulating the distance from the <br />property line. <br />Senior Planner McGuire Brigl stated that currently parking pads following setbacks for accessory <br />use. <br />7.02: Consider Allowing Accessory Dwelling Units on Single -Family Residential Properties <br />Presentation <br />Planning Technician McCann presented the Staff Report stating that staff recommends directing <br />City staff to draft an ordinance to be presented to the Planning Commission during its regular <br />meeting on October 28, 2021 with edits as discussed during the meeting. <br />Commission Business <br />Commissioner VanScoy commented that he is a little uncomfortable with the concept of allowing <br />rental of these units. He noted that many regulations require a familial connection. He stated that <br />Planning Commission/ September 23, 2021 <br />Page 11 of 14 <br />