Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Woestehoff commented that he believes that they should talk to MnDOT because <br />of the right-of-way that would be needed to complete the sound wall for those additional properties. <br />He commented that would make it a continuous wall with the property to the north, which is more <br />visually pleasing and would provide sound mitigation. He stated that if a new wall were <br />constructed on the other side of the trail, he would simply remove the existing wall. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that if a sound wall is placed on the street side of the <br />sidewalk there would be less visual impact for drivers. She commented that if the sound wall is <br />placed on the other side of the sidewalk, it would be less likely to have impacts on future road <br />projects. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff agreed that as they move towards the intersection, he would want to <br />ensure there is sufficient visibility for drivers. <br />Chairperson Riley asked if the direction is for staff to pursue what would be necessary to construct <br />the wall. He also asked for input from staff on the different elements that have been discussed. <br />He stated that he would prefer the wall extend to the end of the plat where it was intended. He <br />stated that he would also want to engage the developer as it sounds like there is blame to be shared, <br />therefore he would support a cost share. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the additional could be priced out as it appears to be a small <br />portion. <br />Chairperson Riley commented that he does not believe that section is small but noted that staff <br />could provide a general cost estimate as an alternative. <br />Mr. Blakely asked if there could be a compromise to extend the wall further, although recognized <br />it may not be able to extend all the way to the other sound wall. <br />City Engineer Westby confirmed that he has sufficient direction. <br />Mr. Blakely asked for input on the timeline for that process. <br />City Engineer Westby replied that the Committee will meet again in November but does not meet <br />in December. He commented that staff has a lot of work to complete in order to provide <br />meaningful answers and responses to address this issue. He noted that perhaps staff could bring <br />this back in January or February. <br />5.04: Consider Recommending City Council Authorization to Prepare Plans and <br />Specifications for 2022 Pavement Management Program Projects <br />City Engineer Westby reviewed the staff report and recommended that the Committee recommend <br />that the City Council authorize preparation of plans and specifications for 2022 Pavement <br />Management Program projects. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if there was a 79 percent increase in the cost. <br />Public Works Committee / October 19, 2021 <br />Page 8of18 <br />