My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/16/2021
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2021
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 11/16/2021
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:35:18 AM
Creation date
11/18/2021 9:07:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
11/16/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
108
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer Westby replied that the cost should not have been that much different. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced Autumn Heights, which is projected similar to expected. <br />She asked what staff used as an estimated cost increase. <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek stated that he went back and reanalyzed using the cost per mile <br />formula. He stated that they budgeted a one percent increase for the next five years in order to <br />build in inflation. He stated that there may need to be some soil corrections in Autumn Heights, <br />which may be reflected in the increase. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that she believed Autumn Heights to be a reasonable <br />increase compared to the other projects. <br />Mr. Feriancek stated that those projects are looked at differently because of the improvements <br />needed. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced Waco Street and asked if it would be cheaper to reconstruct <br />and leave the curb where it is if the residents like that. <br />Mr. Feriancek replied that he believes the condition of the curb and gutter is good and there would <br />be spot replacements. He stated that they have not looked at the alternative of leaving that in place. <br />He noted that while the upfront costs may be higher, they would be doing multiple overlays in the <br />future and there would be additional plowing time as well. <br />City Engineer Westby agreed that the upfront costs would be higher but there would be operational <br />and maintenance savings in the future. He stated that staff could attempt to review the options on <br />cost. <br />Councilmember Musgrove stated that she believes it would be worth getting the input from the <br />residents on that road. <br />Chairperson Riley asked if that could be included as an alternative. He stated that he would be <br />interested in the cost difference before they go out to bid. <br />City Engineer Westby stated that the item could be pushed to the next Committee meeting in order <br />to provide that additional information. <br />Chairperson Riley stated that he is only interested in the cost estimates for the options and would <br />not direct staff to solicit input from the neighborhood. <br />Councilmember Woestehoff stated that he likes the narrowing as it would save staff time and <br />provide consistency. He recognized that there would be a higher cost now, but there would be <br />savings in the future. <br />Public Works Committee / October 19, 2021 <br />Page 9of18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.