Laserfiche WebLink
Commission Input <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if it was submitted to Mn/Dot because it is adjacent to Highway <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated that was correct. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if it complies with Code in all respects, which Associate Planner Oeisler <br />indicated it does. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the applicant has seen the Staff . <br /> <br />Thc applicam indicated he has seen ~t, and h~ no:.:~ssues. W-ft~)~t~:~He;~re~ewe&~ the proposed <br />building and materials. <br /> <br />Chai rpcrson Nixt stated he is in hvor of this, and thi~s~il+ig:.'fme. <br /> <br /> ase ~10 Request for Site Plan Review of'R~ms~:?~6~?b~:Condominiums; Case of <br /> Amcon Construction, Inc. ~:::'~ :' <br /> <br />Associate Geisler advised tha¢ Amcon c0n~irh~::h~g~:-~pplied for site plan review to <br />construct two omce buildihgs':~n th~: P~bpe~g~ib:a&~ed on mverdale Drive and 139th <br /> <br />Ixme. She indicated <br />acre lot, to be created as <br />zoned Mixed-Use PUD. <br />District standards will be <br />thc site plan has been <br />requirements. : <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained that <br />square feet of floor space for office buildings. She <br />utility lines fbr both this site plan and the Slumberland <br />common property line, and placed within a drainage and <br /> <br />site plan proposes .~0~ 6,000~Sqfiare-foot office buildings on a 1.25- <br />ofRi, zenwick vill~ge.'2:~i'Add:{tion. She stated the site is currently <br />that as pgrmi-tt~d':bY the MU-PUD District, B-2 Business <br />the site plan proposal. She stated that lot coverage for <br /> Che added that the proposed site plan meets all setback <br /> <br />uires one parking space for each 300 <br /> that Staff is recommending that the <br /> ;al to the east be relocated to the <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler stated: that the submitted grading and draina will require some <br />revision to ensure they comply With the overall grading and drainage was approved <br />with thc original Rivenwick Village subdivision. She indicated that Staff is rec~ that a <br />revised plan be prepared prior to bringing the site plan to the'City Council for an. <br /> <br />A..~sociatc Planner Geisler advised that Staff is recommending approval of the site <br />contingent on receipt of a revised grading and drainage plan that addresses the items listed in <br />City StaW review letter~ <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 8, 2005 <br /> Page 26 of 29 <br /> <br /> <br />