Laserfiche WebLink
4.2 Discussion <br />Roadways Based on a brief review of historical aerial photographs available on Google Earth and <br />the Anoka County GIS website it appears that the streets were originally built sometime around <br />1990 thru about 1997 and based on that they appear to be approaching or have exceeded their <br />assumed 20-year design life. <br />Observations of the bituminous cores appears to indicate that the roadways were seal coated/chip <br />coated as evidence by smaller sized aggregate at the surface of the cores. It further appears that <br />some of the roadways may have been overlaid, especially near soil boring / core 06. The core at <br />SB-06 was about 61/2 inches thick or about 11/2 inches thicker, or more, that the cores at soil borings <br />SB-01 thru SB-05 . <br />We observed longitudinal and transvers cracks with some "alligator" or fatigue cracking of the <br />pavement surfaces. The cracking observed could be the result of a combination of factors <br />including; inadequate pavement thickness, pavement age and possibly frost action/frost heave. <br />Longitudinal cracking are cracks parallel to the pavement centerline or laydown direction. These <br />can be caused by poor joint construction, reflective cracking from an underlying layer, fatigue <br />cracking or top -down cracking resulting from the age of the pavement or due to expansion and <br />contraction of the pavement surface or increased loads/traffic on the pavements. <br />Transverse cracking are cracks perpendicular to the roadway centerline or laydown direction. <br />These are often caused by shrinkage of the pavement surface, reflective cracking from an <br />underlying layer or top -down cracking. <br />Alligator or fatigue cracking can be symptomatic of poor subgrade soils and/or inadequate <br />pavement thickness. <br />Aggregate Base An apparent aggregate base layer was observed below the pavements at each <br />boring location. The aggregate base appeared to contain little gravel and because of that it is <br />identified as Possible Aggregate Base on the boring logs. Based on our observations the aggregate <br />base or Possible Aggregate Base may not meet MN/DOT gradation specifications for Class 5 <br />aggregate base. It is possible that the Possible Aggregate base was initially placed as new or virgin <br />Class 5 aggregate base but has degraded over time due to traffic or possibly due to frost action. <br />Soils The borings encountered sandy subgrade soils consisting of poorly graded sand <br />corresponding to the ASTM Classification SP. These soils are considered non -frost susceptible <br />and are also free draining materials and are well suited for pavement support and. <br />Where spot fixes of the utilities will occur, we anticipate that the soils excavated for utility repairs <br />will be reused to the greatest extent possible. The soils encountered in the borings in our opinion <br />is suitable for reuse. We recommend that any unsuitable materials such as buried topsoil, organic <br />soils and any soft or otherwise unsuitable materials, if encountered, be removed and replaced with <br />suitable compacted engineered fill. <br />6 <br />