Laserfiche WebLink
23. <br /> <br />ri'hat the proposed use will be compatible with the residential neighborhood due to <br />density and lot size of the surrounding lots. <br /> <br />24. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not be unduly dangerous or otherwise detrimental to persons <br />residing or working in the vicinity of the use or to the public welfare. <br /> <br />25. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment, or <br />market value of any surrounding property. <br /> <br />26. <br /> <br />ri'bat the proposed use will not be hazardous or disturbing to existing or future <br />neighboring uses. <br /> <br />27. <br /> <br />ri'hat the proposed use will be served adequately by public facilities and services such as <br />highways and streets. <br /> <br />28. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for <br />public facilities and services, and it will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the <br />community. <br /> <br />29. <br /> <br />That the proposed use will not involve activities and uses that will be detrimental to any <br />persons, property, or the general welfare by reason of excessive production of traffic, <br />noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. <br /> <br />~l'he motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Councilmember <br />Jeffrey, and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec <br />('m~ncilmember Cook <br />(!ouncilmember Jeffrey <br />Councilmember Olson <br />Councilmember Pearson <br />(~ouncilmember Strommen <br /> <br />and thc Ibllowing voted against the same: <br /> <br />Nolle <br /> <br />tho l'ollowing abstained: <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig <br /> <br />and the [k~llowing were absent: <br /> <br />Noilo <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-07-232 <br /> Page 3 of 4 <br /> <br /> <br />