Agenda - Council - 02/22/2022 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

focusing on the existing system but there would be a possibility to connect the parks buildings in the future if desired. Mayor Kuzma asked for details on the camera system and whether that would be connected, or if the existing system would continue to be used. I.T. Manager Fredrickson replied that the Honeywell system that the City has does not tie into the cameras and staff would propose to continue to use that separate system rather than tying the systems together at this time as it would simply cause an additional cost that is not necessary. Councimember Woestehoff commented that the system quotes seem similar and stated that there seems to be a cost savings to moving to the cloud. He asked if two factors would be a requirement for either system. I.T. Manager Fredrickson commented that the current access to the door system includes himself, I.T Support Technician Kubat and the facilities team and provided additional details. It was the consensus of the Council to support moving forward with PDK. 2.03: Review Date for Annual Planning Session City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the staff report. Councimember Heineman commented that he will be on 30-day military orders and therefore would be available remotely. The consensus of the Council was to move forward with the date as proposed in the staff report. 3. TOPICS FOR FUTURE DISCiSSION 3.01: Review Future Topics/ Calendar City Administrator Ulrich reviewed the future topics calendar. 4. MAYOR/COUNCIL / STAFF INPUT Deputy City Administrator Gadhi1 noted that the property owner for the abatement case on tonight's regular agenda reached out to at least one Councimember stating that they would like to speak tonight, so that item will be removed from Consent to provide that ability. He provided background information on the property and the code enforcement history. He noted that the property owner felt they were being treated unfairly and provided three other properties in the area in violation, noting that staff was not aware of those properties and code enforcement will be following up on those properties as well. He noted that this property owner does not dispute that the property is in violation, noting that staff has been working on the case since 2019 and this is the first response from the property owner. He noted that an extension could be considered now City Council Work Session/April 13, 2021 Page 5 of 8