Laserfiche WebLink
From: Jason Patrow <br />To: Brian Hagen; Ryan Heineman; Matt Woestehoff; Mark Kuzma; Chelsee Howell; Debra Musgrove; Dan Soecht; <br />Chris Riley; Chris Anderson <br />Cc: ramseyrezoningwatch@gmail.com <br />Subject: PACT School Proposal (Project No. 22-107) <br />Date: Wednesday, March 2, 2022 3:19:42 PM <br />City Board Members, <br />Good afternoon, my name is Jason Patrow. My family and I live off of Variolite and 163Ave. <br />We are extremely concerned about the impacts of bringing a school into our neighborhood. We live <br />in a quiet area with not a lot of traffic, it is very peaceful. <br />We understand that it's important for PACT to expand and that they would benefit greatly from <br />another school. The problem is, the location that they want to build it on. It's currently zoned for <br />residential and the roads are not equipped to handle the amount of traffic that a school would bring <br />especially with buses existing off of Variolite. <br />Below is a list of concerns we have: <br />• The amount of traffic twice a day even with road improvements would cripple our <br />neighborhood. The only way in or out of our neighborhood is on Variolite. It would <br />dramatically interfere with the response time of emergency vehicles to our neighborhood <br />during those time should the need ever arise. <br />• The current site plan for the school doesn't allow for enough space for the 12 buses they <br />require which could put the safety of the student at risk. <br />• There is not nearly enough room for the student drop off and pickup which will push traffic <br />back out onto Variolite or 161st causing even more traffic problems. <br />• The proposed entrance and exit road to the north for pickup and drop off would be a blind <br />spot for traffic do to the hill and its location. This will cause many accidents and possible <br />death in that location. Those of us that live here know how bad it already is at the <br />intersection of 161st & Variolite. <br />• The lack of space for a retention pond for containing all of the runoff from the site. If an <br />underground vault system was to be used there is no storm sewers to carry it away after it <br />was treated. From personal experience and dealing with this type of system, I know the cost <br />associated with it. Our company just proposed installing one for capturing the contents of a <br />tanker truck and the cost was reaching $175,000. The system here would need to be much <br />larger. <br />• The very bright lights that will be shining through our neighborhood. <br />• The noise pollution from load speakers. <br />• The roof top HVAC units for these types of facilities run all night long and are very load. <br />• The damage done to the ecosystem of the wetlands. <br />• The water level in the spring time behind some of our homes gets very high already and any <br />added water to the system could push it into our homes. <br />• The added runoff from having to widen the roads do to the added traffic. <br />