Laserfiche WebLink
RELEVANT LINKS: <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.221, listing <br />powers of the council. <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.201, <br />requiring council approval of <br />contracts for Standard Plan <br />and Plan A cities. <br />Plymouth Foam Products, <br />Inc. v. City. of Becker, 944 F. <br />Supp. 781 (D. Minn. 1996). <br />Minn. Stat. § 412.611. <br />For further discussion of Plan <br />B cities, see discussion 11I <br />below. <br />Minn. Stat. § 410.16. <br />A. Role scenario <br />The following employment scenario helps demonstrate how an individual <br />councilmember, who just wants to do the right thing for the city, can <br />overstep his or her role in dealing with employee discipline and <br />termination, potentially exposing the city to liability. <br />Imagine the council has ongoing concerns with the municipal liquor store <br />manager. Citizens complain the store is closed when it should be open and <br />that the staff drinks on the premises. One councilmember decides to <br />address the situation herself. She continuously stops by the store and even <br />drives by the manager's house to make sure he is not home when he <br />should be working. During one visit to the store, the councilmember finds <br />the staff, including the manager, drinking in the back of the store. <br />Knowing the council would agree, she terminates the manager on the spot. <br />To make this situation easier, she negotiates a severance package with <br />him. The councilmember then relates the incident to several friends, <br />making some exaggerated descriptions of what happened. <br />Even though the liquor store manager's actions raise many liability <br />concerns for the city, the councilmember acted beyond the scope of her <br />authority and her actions also present problems for the city. <br />B. Investigating and terminating employees <br />In the scenario above, did the councilmember have authority to investigate <br />or terminate the store manager? No. <br />In Minnesota, state statutes or city charters set forth city council powers. <br />In statutory Standard Plan and Plan A cities, the statutes give the entire <br />council control over city matters, including the power to control city <br />finances, to make contracts, to enact ordinances, and to oversee city <br />personnel. The statutes do not allow an individual councilmember to <br />independently investigate employees or terminate employment. In the <br />optional statutory Plan B cities, known as the council-manager plan, the <br />council determines all matters of policy, and a city manager heads up the <br />administrative branch with responsibility to the council for the proper <br />administration of all affairs relating to city. <br />In charter cities, the charter dictates a councilmember's role. State law <br />allows charter cities to adopt any form of government, if it is not <br />inconsistent with state statutes or the state constitution. In almost all <br />charter cities, the charter gives authority to the council rather than to <br />individual councilmembers. However, councilmembers from charter cities <br />should consult their charters to determine their proper roles. <br />League of Minnesota Cities Information Memo: 4/14/2020 <br />Role with It: Individual Versus Council Authority Page 4 <br />