Laserfiche WebLink
From: Jason Patrow <br /> To: Brian Hagen;Ryan Heineman; Matt WoestehofF; Mark Kuzma;Chelsee Howell; Debra Musgrove; Dan Specht; <br /> Chris Riley;Chris Anderson <br /> Cc: ramseyrezoningwatch(&amail.com <br /> Subject: PACT School Proposal(Project No. 22-107) <br /> Date: Wednesday,March 2,2022 3:19:42 PM <br /> City Board Members, <br /> Good afternoon, my name is Jason Patrow. My family and I live off of Variolite and 163Ave. <br /> We are extremely concerned about the impacts of bringing a school into our neighborhood. We live <br /> in a quiet area with not a lot of traffic, it is very peaceful. <br /> We understand that it's important for PACT to expand and that they would benefit greatly from <br /> another school. The problem is, the location that they want to build it on. It's currently zoned for <br /> residential and the roads are not equipped to handle the amount of traffic that a school would bring <br /> especially with buses existing off of Variolite. <br /> Below is a list of concerns we have: <br /> • The amount of traffic twice a day even with road improvements would cripple our <br /> neighborhood. The only way in or out of our neighborhood is on Variolite. It would <br /> dramatically interfere with the response time of emergency vehicles to our neighborhood <br /> during those time should the need ever arise. <br /> • The current site plan for the school doesn't allow for enough space for the 12 buses they <br /> require which could put the safety of the student at risk. <br /> • There is not nearly enough room for the student drop off and pickup which will push traffic <br /> back out onto Variolite or 161st causing even more traffic problems. <br /> • The proposed entrance and exit road to the north for pickup and drop off would be a blind <br /> spot for traffic do to the hill and its location. This will cause many accidents and possible <br /> death in that location.Those of us that live here know how bad it already is at the <br /> intersection of 161st &Variolite. <br /> • The lack of space for a retention pond for containing all of the runoff from the site. If an <br /> underground vault system was to be used there is no storm sewers to carry it away after it <br /> was treated. From personal experience and dealing with this type of system, I know the cost <br /> associated with it. Our company just proposed installing one for capturing the contents of a <br /> tanker truck and the cost was reaching $175,000. The system here would need to be much <br /> la rger. <br /> • The very bright lights that will be shining through our neighborhood. <br /> • The noise pollution from load speakers. <br /> • The roof top HVAC units for these types of facilities run all night long and are very load. <br /> • The damage done to the ecosystem of the wetlands. <br /> • The water level in the spring time behind some of our homes gets very high already and any <br /> added water to the system could push it into our homes. <br /> • The added runoff from having to widen the roads do to the added traffic. <br />