Laserfiche WebLink
PlanningTechnician McCann resented the staff report stating that staff recommends adoption of <br /> p <br /> Ordinance#22-08. <br /> Chairperson Bauer acknowledged that the Commission has discussed this concept in the past. <br /> Citizen In ut <br /> No comments. <br /> Motion b Commissioner VanSco , seconded b Commissioner Dunaway, to close the public <br /> Y Y Y <br /> hearing. <br /> A roll call vote was performed: <br /> Commissioner Anderson aye <br /> Commissioner walker aye <br /> Commissioner VanScoy aye <br /> Commissioner Dunaway aye <br /> Commissioner Peters aye <br /> Commissioner Gengler aye <br /> Chairperson Bauer aye <br /> F; <br /> 1: <br /> Motion Carried. <br /> Chairperson Bauer closed the public hearing closed at 9:02 p.m. <br /> 1 <br /> Commission Business <br /> Commissioner Anderson asked if this would only be the decision of the City Council and not the <br /> Planning Commission. <br /> he opposite. He noted that it would be the decision . <br /> Chairperson Bauer explained that It would be the pp � <br /> of the Planning Commission and not require consideration of the City Council, similar to the <br /> F <br /> process of a variance request. .x <br /> l <br /> Planning Technician McCann stated that the existing procedure was included in the case and then <br /> there was more information on how the process would be held if this were approved. <br /> City Planner Anderson noted that if the Planning Commission denied a request,the applicant could <br /> take the request to the City Council for appeal, similar to a variance. <br /> Commissioner Anderson commented that he found the language in the staff report confusing. He <br /> stated that he does,support having the Planning Commission make the decision on a Conditional <br /> is <br /> Use Permit. <br /> S' <br /> i <br /> Planning Commission/January 27,2022 <br /> Page 17 of 22 <br />