My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 03/08/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 03/08/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:19:07 PM
Creation date
3/16/2022 10:27:34 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
03/08/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
547
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
z <br /> { <br /> Commissioner vanScoy asked if there has even been a situation where the Council has overturned <br /> a recommendation front the Commission on a CUP. <br /> Planning Technician McCann commented that he was not aware of such a case. <br /> City Planner Anderson replied that perhaps over the course of time it has happened once or twice <br /> but noted that it would be unconunon. <br /> Councilmember woestehoff stated that he has not experienced overturning but has seen additional z` <br /> conditions added by the City Council. <br /> Commissioner vanScoy commented that there is value in shortening the process but stated that <br /> there is also value in having additional review by two sets of eyes. r <br /> CityPlanner Anderson commented that an applicant would still have the ability to appeal the <br /> pp <br /> decision of the Commission and tale that to the City Council. <br /> Chairperson Bauer commented that he can recall a variance the Commission denied which was <br /> taken to the City Council and gained approval. <br /> s <br /> City Planner Anderson commented that he could also recall a Home occupation Permit that was <br /> denied by the Commission and appealed to the City Council where it was approved. <br /> -Commissioner Dunaway asked how the process would work if the Planning Commission were to <br /> approve a CUP. He asked the mechanism that would be used if the City Council did not agree <br /> with the decision or wanted to add additional conditions. <br /> City Planner Anderson replied that the Council could choose to actively participate in the public <br /> hearing as a resident or member of the City Council. He stated that if something were approved, 4 <br /> a resident could potentially appeal the decision through the same process an applicant would have. <br /> He commented that without an official appeal, the decision at the Planning Commission level <br /> pp � g <br /> would be final. <br /> Commissioner vanScoy stated that the case mentions that this was brought forward by discussion <br /> at a City Council wort-,session. He asked if the Council supports this action. <br /> Councilmember woestehoff stated that generically he believes there is support but believed that <br /> direction came about before he joined the Council. He noted that this action tonight would still <br /> need to be approved b the City Council,therefore that consideration will be provided. <br /> pp y y <br /> 1 <br /> Motion by Commissioner vanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to recommend that City <br /> Council introduce ordinance#22-08 Amending City Code Chapter 117-51 Regarding Conditional ! <br /> Use Permits. <br /> A roll call vote was performed. <br /> l <br /> Planning Commission/January 27,2022 <br /> Page 18 of 22 <br /> 3 <br /> 1I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.