Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Zimmerman, Anderson, <br />and Hendriksen. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #2: Adopt Resolution Approving Proposed 2002 Payable Tax Levy <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund presented the proposed 2002 Payable Tax Levy in the amount of <br />$4,814,550. She explained that the proposed levy can always be reduced, but it cannot be <br />increased without "higher" level approval through an appeals process. Therefore, it was staff's <br />position that the maximum proposed levy be adopted at the level proposed. The proposed levy <br />must be certified to Anoka County by Monday, September 17, 2001. <br /> <br />Motion by Mayor Gamec, seconded by Councilmember Anderson, to recommend that the City <br />Council adopt the Resolution Approving the Proposed Maximum 2001, Payable 2002, Tax Levy. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Councilmember Kurak inquired if it was true that the property owners in the <br />Mississippi Subdrainage District cannot pay off the cost early. Finance Officer Lund replied yes, <br />explaining that it cannot be paid off early because the cost was placed on their property taxes. <br />Councilmember Kurak inquired if the property owners were being charged interest. Finance <br />Officer Lund replied yes. Councilmember Kurak inquired if the property owners will be paying <br />more than what the project cost is at the end of the ten years. Councilmember Hendriksen stated <br />that the 444 process was put in place by the legislature because the people at the top of the hill do <br />not think they have a problem while the people on the bottom are swimming. Under the <br />assessment process it can become very problematic in that scenario which is why 444 was put in <br />place. Finance Officer Lund reviewed how property owners are levied for the project. <br />Councilmember Zimmerman stated that in a time of high taxes he does not know how the City <br />could include the purchase of an aerial ladder truck. Councilmember Hendriksen stated that <br />when the City has to add in excess of a ½ million dollars in aid cuts, the City needs to have some <br />fiscal restraints particularly on the certificate of indebtedness. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Anderson, and Kurak. Voting <br />No: Councilmembers Hendriksen and Zimmerman. <br /> <br />Case #3: Review and Adopt "Proposed" 2002 General Fund Budget <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund stated that the 2002 Proposed General Fund Budget, as it has been <br />presented, is based on the collection of tax dollars at a level that has an imposed levy limit <br />reenacted for 2002 payable. The 2002 budget includes an increase in the staffing complement by <br />one full-time Associate Planner, one full-time Engineering Tech IV, and increasing the current <br />Community Service Officer and Mechanic positions from half time to full time. The budget as <br />presented includes $117,850 of capital outlay items. A small portion of these capital items will <br />be funded from the Equipment Revolving Fund. In total, Public Safety, is now 36.62 percent of <br />the budget. General Government is 28.51 percent of the budget. Public Works and Parks <br />represent 25.26 percent and miscellaneous and transfers make-up the balance. The 2002 <br /> <br />Finance Committee/September 11, 2001 <br /> Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />