Laserfiche WebLink
Associate Planner Geisler advised there are access points at Nowthen Boulevard, and at the <br />(mtlot, adding that the sidewalk will need to be moved to the other side of the street. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked what the two outlets were for if they are not for density transitioning. <br /> <br />Mr. Pctcrson advised he has been working with some of the neighboring homeowners to develop <br />their lots soon after this one. He stated those outlets are there to help facilitate their <br />subdivisions. <br /> <br />(;hairperson Nixt stated he will leave it to Staff to address the outlets in Block 5 and Block 6 on <br />thc eastern edge of the plat. He added that Block 10, Lots 1 through 6 and 16 also need to be <br />looked at; all are adjacent to people who spoke tonight, but all are not noted in the Staff Review <br />l,ctter, tlc asked if there is an impact on drainage related to Mr. Smith's property. <br /> <br />Mr. Passe indicated there is no problem. He stated the way the lots are lined up they are <br />proposing a swale down into a catch basin on their property. <br /> <br />('ommissioner Johnson asked what they are proposing to do with lots by the newly proposed <br />roads. <br /> <br />Mr. Pctcrson showed how the lots would be configured if the street were allowed to be stubbed, <br />versus thc cul-de-sac. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he feels that limits the ability to property transition. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson noted that it would be going from six lots to three lots that would abut <br />thc a¢[jaccnt property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked if they would require Garnet be updated. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated that the problem is if there is any indication that the homeowners <br />would like to subdivide, and have sewer and water, they would have to tear up the road again. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson asked how necessary the 166th Avenue alignment is, noting that Mr. <br />l'cterson stated it would adversely affect two homeowners. <br /> <br />Mr. Pctcrson stated that either alignment may require some condemnation. <br /> <br />Corem i ssioner Johnson asked how critical it is to put 167th Avenue through in the next five to ten <br />years. <br /> <br />City l';ngi ncer Jankowski stated it is not very critical in that time frame. <br /> <br />Mr. l'etcrson stated that all of the property necessary is not purchased at this point, but as he laid <br />ot~t the case to the City Council and showed them the proposal, there was considerable support <br />Ibr thc [ 66o' Avenue alignment. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/August 8, 2005 <br /> Page 8 of 26 <br /> <br /> <br />