Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> RESOLUTION#21-347 <br /> RESOLUTION DETERMINING THAT AN ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT (EIS) <br /> IS NOT NECESSARY FOR TROTT BROOK NORTH <br /> WHEREAS, TEG Land Holdings, LLC, dba Twin Cities Land Development (previously Sotarra), <br /> hereafter referred to as "Developer", properly applied for Preliminary Plat approval of the property located in <br /> the City of Ramsey legally described in Exhibit A(the `Subject Property'); <br /> WHEREAS, Minnesota Rules 4410.4300, Subp. 19.C, requires that an EAW be prepared for this <br /> project; and <br /> WHEREAS, the EAW was publicly noticed in the EQB Monitor, commencing the 30-day public <br /> comment period; and <br /> WHEREAS, the EAW was distributed with City Council authorization and the comment period was <br /> properly noticed and held from September 28,2021 to October 28, 2021 and ended at 4:30 pm; and <br /> WHEREAS, copies of the EAW were distributed to all persons and agencies on the official <br /> Environmental Quality Board (EQB) distribution list and other interested parties and hard copies were made <br /> available to the public at City Hall; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City, through its consultant,WSB, accepted and responded to all comments; and <br /> WHEREAS,none of the comments received recommended preparation of an EIS, and none suggested <br /> that the project had the potential to cause significant environmental effects; and <br /> WHEREAS,the City Council determined an EIS is not necessary on December 14, 2021. <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, <br /> ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> 1. That the Ramsey City Council hereby determines that an Environmental Impact Statement is not <br /> required for Trott Brook Crossing based on the following: <br /> a. The EAW was prepared in compliance with the procedures of the Minnesota Environmental <br /> Policy Act and Minnesota Rules,Parts 4410.1000 to 4410.1700 (2015), <br /> b. The EAW satisfactorily addressed the environmental issues for which existing information <br /> could have been reasonably obtained, <br /> c. Based on the criteria established in Minnesota Rules 4410.1700, the project does not have the <br /> potential for significant environmental effects, <br /> d. The City makes a"Negative Declaration," <br /> e. The City adopts the Response to Comments, Findings of Fact, and Record of Decision for <br /> Environmental Assessment Worksheet (Record of Decision) and directs the Community <br /> Development Director to maintain the Record of Decision and to distribute it in accordance with <br /> the EQB rules. <br />