Laserfiche WebLink
Board Mmn ber introduced the following resolution and moved for its adoption: <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #05-09- <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT #0 RELATING TO A <br />REQUEST FOR A VARIANCE FROM FRONT YARD SETBACK REQUIREMENTS IN <br />THE R-I RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Oakwood Land 'Development, Inc., hereinafter referred to as "Applicant", <br />has properly applied for a Board of Adjustment variance to the front yard setback requirement <br />establishcd in Section 9.20.1 l (R-'I Residential District) of the Ramsey City Code on the property <br />generally located east of Variolite Street at 161st Avenue N.W., proposed to be platted as <br />Swcctbay Ridge and legally described as follows:- <br /> <br />Part of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 32, <br />Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br />And <br /> <br />Part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 16, Township 32, <br />Range 25, Anoka County, Minnesota <br /> <br />(the "~ubject Property") <br /> <br /> NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT <br />OF THE CITY OF RAMSEY, ANOKA COUNTY, STATE OF MINNESOTA, as follows: <br /> <br />That thc Applicant appeared before the Board of Adjustment for a public hearing pursuant to <br />Section 9.03.07 of the Ramsey City Code on October 6, 2005, and that said public hearing <br />was properly advertised and that the minutes of said public hearing are hereby incorporated <br />as a part of these findings by reference. <br /> <br />That Section 9.20.11 (R-I Residential District), Sub& 4 (Bulk Standards), Metropolitan <br />Urban Service Area (MUSA), establishes a front yard setback: of thirty (30) feet from the <br />righbo t-way of public roads. <br /> <br />That the ~bllowing parcels in the proposed plat were designed with a twenty-five (25) foot <br />setback fi-om the public road right-of-way: Lots 18, 19, and 39 through 92, as reflected on <br />the Preliminary Plat dated May 2, 2005, revised August 2, 2005. <br /> <br />That the Applisant has stated that the reduced setback is necessary for the following reasons: <br />a) tnaintain compliance with standard public street right-of-way requirements; b) reduce the <br />amount ot' wetland filling; c) increase wetland buffer widths; d) reduce the amount of tree <br />~em~val required. <br /> <br />5 <br /> <br /> <br />