Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Musgrove stated that based on the most recent Council discussions, she would <br />like to have a discussion about the appointment to the EPB. She thought there was a consensus <br />that the vertical appointment to the Charter and another Board or Commission was not as desirable, <br />but to have someone horizontally serve on two Boards was acceptable. She asked if there was <br />interest in a conversation about options or possibilities regarding this. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma replied he believed setting the new policy would be addressed at the next meeting. <br />He thought the people that are on the Commission, and there are several that are on multiple <br />Commissions so he didn’t see how Council could take them off. He suggested they should be <br />grandfathered in to finish out their terms and the new policy could be implemented as the terms <br />run out. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht asked if these didn’t have terms that were ending and if the question was <br />whether or not to keep them on. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma replied these are terms that are up right now that Council filled but the people who <br />are serving on multiple levels right now, and he knew of at least two people who were serving on <br />multiple boards. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht replied the concern, as Councilmember Woestehoff had brought up, is the <br />horizontal versus vertical move. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff corrected it was Councilmember Heineman. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht replied that is the idea of the difference there. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman asked if there was a statute or anything that say Council has to approve <br />the incumbents tonight. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied no. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman continued he thought some of the frustration he is picking up from <br />Councilmember Musgrove is that their hands are tied for this City Council meeting even though a <br />change is coming but they are about to make a recommendation for a four-year term a week before <br />revising the policy. He thought the question was whether Council waits to confirm the re- <br />appointment suggestions until after the policy is written, because if the policy changes that would <br />impact the decision. He didn’t think it was a good policy to push it through and have it be <br />implemented four years later. He asked Councilmember Musgrove if that was correct. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove replied she agreed because there was a consensus that they didn’t like <br />it, this is the policy they have now, and that Council gets a chance to review it. She thought the <br />Mayor wanted to do it as it has been done in the past instead of looking at the policy and that is <br />where her frustration is coming from. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell commented on Councilmember Heineman’s suggestion that the <br />timeframe allows an opportunity to make a policy change and implement it. She asked if it helped <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 15, 2022 <br />Page 7 of 19 <br /> <br />