Laserfiche WebLink
Administrative Services Director Lasher to have applicants on file that she can draw from, if that <br />made her process easier. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied yes, very much. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell suggested Administrative Services Director Lasher propose what works <br />for that regarding how many people she wanted on file and for how long to make it less <br />complicated. <br /> <br />Administrative Services Director Lasher replied they state that applications will stay on file for <br />roughly one year. She explained it is very helpful to have a candidate that has been vetted, that <br />they have notes on and, as was said earlier, that a certain candidate would be good for a certain <br />position. She stated opening up full recruitments is really time consuming and resources are very <br />thin in HR, which is something she doesn’t see changing. She stated if the policy were streamlined <br />it would be a better use of time and better for the citizens. She stated she has suggestions that <br />Council may like. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma commented that the five incumbents being considered have been good contributors <br />on the Commissions and they don’t have any other people to consider right now. He didn’t <br />understand why these incumbents couldn’t be approved because they are needed on the <br />Commissions and there isn’t backup for them. <br /> <br />Councilmember Howell replied not approving them tonight doesn’t say that Council doesn’t want <br />these people, that their service isn’t appreciated, or that they won’t continue, but it gives Council <br />the opportunity to put the policy first and go through the steps properly instead of having things <br />out of order yet again. <br /> <br />Councilmember Heineman agreed, adding that he doesn’t have anything against the candidates <br />and he would probably vote for them next week. He recalled when they did the budget, they <br />couldn’t make changes to specific line items because the budget was too close. However the <br />purpose of putting together the budget was to make changes to line items. He thought it was being <br />inferred that they are too close to the process so it shouldn’t be changed; however, they are in the <br />perfect position to change it before getting to it. If Council is making decisions on terms and <br />reappointments, he felt the wise thing would be to wait to have the discussion and then make final <br />recommendations. He supported putting the policy in place, have it take immediate effect instead <br />of waiting four years, especially because they are still in the allotted amount of time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Woestehoff replied he didn’t have a problem with any of that but suggested asking <br />Laura Moore if she would serve on EPB or Charter because she may say she would resign from <br />the Charter. He stated it is well known that there are other applicants waiting to serve on that <br />Board than there are on EPB. He thought it was worth having a conversation with her and taking <br />her opinion into consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove agreed it is a great idea to see which Board Ms. Moore wants to serve <br />on, as Ms. Moore is very passionate about EPB and participates, which is appreciated. <br /> <br />City Council Special Work Session / March 15, 2022 <br />Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />