My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:30:25 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 11:46:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/10/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
478
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Riley suggested sending a list of questions to the judge and asking for feedback <br /> rather than speculating what information is wanted. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied her thinking is based on the email received from the judge's <br /> assistant on the application process that cities have their policy and give direction and give <br /> recommendation, and the judge takes that into consideration. <br /> City Attorney Knaak commented that the value of having the City's effort and policy in place and <br /> sending it to the judge asking for comment would be appreciated. He stated in the absence of <br /> direction, the judge has the authority and could appoint an applicant that is a friend or brother. He <br /> stated if it is done ahead of a time when a selection is needed to be made and interaction with the <br /> judge took place, there may be more of a chance the judge would follow a policy put in place if <br /> they have had input and approved it. He thought presenting a package including a policy for the <br /> judge to review and comment on would be better than going to the judge to ask for their ideas on <br /> what they would want. He thought some interaction with the judge so they don't think the Council <br /> doesn't respect their position of authority. <br /> Councilmember Howell stated she has learned in 17 years of teaching and working with <br /> curriculums that things can always be improved. She stated it isn't a poor relation of what has <br /> gone before, it's just that there is always room for improvement and it is important. She thought <br /> if the application could be revised and sent off it would be good. <br /> Mayor Kuzma summarized the consensus is to update the application and send it to the judge and <br /> then reconvene to set a policy. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if they could get the missing pages before that happens. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher replied yes. <br /> Councilmember Howell suggested sending suggestions to Administrative Services Director <br /> Lasher and then see a revised version that everyone agrees to before it goes to the judge would be <br /> great. <br /> Mayor Kuzma replied absolutely. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher asked if Councilmember Howell was referring to the <br /> revised application as well as the updated policy. <br /> Councilmember Howell replied yes. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher referenced page one regarding the incumbents. She stated <br /> she thought there were some incumbents that were just reappointed because they said they wanted <br /> to be and that went to the judge and he or she reappointed them. She thought it has been a long <br /> time since those members have given information that was discussed on the application. She asked <br /> if the incumbents should fill out the application. <br /> City Council Work Session/April 12, 2022 <br /> Page 10 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.