My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:30:25 PM
Creation date
5/10/2022 11:46:39 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/10/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
478
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Howell replied the members are already appointed so it is irrelevant. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff replied other Board and Commission members reinterview so he <br /> thought it would be consistent. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher asked if incumbents are given preferential status over <br /> new applicants if they are sent all together. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied it depends on the judge. He stated the Council could recommend to <br /> the judge that they like people appointed who have experience and a judge would probably accept <br /> that but there is nothing under that law that says they be treated any differently at all. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher asked if there is a stellar group of new applicants, can the <br /> judge appoint a new applicant over an incumbent. <br /> Mayor Kuzma replied sure. <br /> Councilmember Specht commented that since the Charter is appointed by the judge, he thought an <br /> incumbent on the Charter is different than the other Boards and Commissions so he didn't think <br /> having them do an application was an extra step that was necessary. <br /> Councilmember Heineman commented that the difference between the Boards and Commissions <br /> and the Charter was the Council had authority over the Boards and Commissions. He stated the <br /> Charter is an overarching entity over the Council so he thought giving direction to people applying <br /> to Boards and Commissions makes sense but he thought they needed to be careful in dictating <br /> things without precedence in regards to the Charter Commission. He suggested leaving it as is for <br /> the incumbents. <br /> Councilmember Howell agreed with leaving it as it is as well and focus on making the application <br /> better. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove agreed with that adding the Council is trying give the judge insight into <br /> the Council's policy and process but it is the judge's decision. She didn't think it was a good idea <br /> to have incumbents reapply if they are willing to serve. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if the policy could state experience would be favored. He asked <br /> how the Councilmembers felt about having incumbent reapply. <br /> Councilmember Howell replied she hadn't thought about it before today but she has been reading <br /> about how Charter Commission applications are being done in other cities. She thought it was <br /> pretty unusual for a judge to remove a sitting Charter Commission member so it would seem odd <br /> to have incumbents reapply. She thought that would give the impression that there is <br /> dissatisfaction with the Charter Commission. <br /> City Council Work Session/April 12, 2022 <br /> Page 11 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.