My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/17/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Public Works Committee
>
2022
>
Agenda - Public Works Committee - 05/17/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 11:37:18 AM
Creation date
5/13/2022 8:28:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
05/17/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5.01: Consider Recommending City Council Approval of Plans and Specifications and <br />Award of Contract for Improvement Project #22-09, 2022 Pavement Rejuvenation <br />Improvements <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek reviewed the staff report and staff recommendation to recommend City <br />Council approval of plans and specifications and award of contract for Improvement Project #22- <br />09, 2022 Pavement Rejuvenation Improvements. <br />Councilmember Musgrove referenced the 8.45 miles of roads that were recently constructed and <br />asked how much of that is in the total that would ideally like to be captured. <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that he did not have exact numbers but noted that they are <br />catching almost all the new developments in this process. <br />City Engineer Westby replied that they are beginning to make good headway in catching up but <br />still have a ways to go. <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek stated that for Riverstone they are getting the first, second and third <br />additions and will wait to do the second half of the development at a later time. He noted that <br />some of the newer additions of the new developments do not yet have the final wear course. <br />Chairperson Riley asked if this length of road was chosen because of budget constraints. <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek confirmed that they did work within the budget constraints. <br />City Engineer Westby replied that the COVID street maintenance funds were a one-time funding <br />source, and the City chose to use its allocation on pavement maintenance for local streets. <br />Chairperson Riley referenced a street segment which is about five years old. <br />Civil Engineer II Feriancek noted that street is at the point where if that is not applied at this time, <br />it may not be beneficial to apply pavement rejuvenator in a year or two. <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked if the goal is to complete 8.45 miles and whether the motion <br />would include a not to exceed amount for the funding. <br />City Engineer Westby replied that the intent is to spend the full allocation of $200,000 budgeted <br />for pavement maintenance so the pavement rejuvenation project mileage will be adjusted <br />accordingly depending on the crackseal bids received. <br />Motion by Councilmember Musgrove, seconded by Councilmember Riley, to recommend City <br />Council approval of plans and specifications and award of contract for Improvement Project #22- <br />09, 2022 Pavement Rejuvenation Improvements. <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Riley, Councilmembers Musgrove and Howell. Voting <br />No: None. <br />Public Works Committee / April 19, 2022 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.