My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2022
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 05/10/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/13/2025 10:29:09 AM
Creation date
5/25/2022 10:39:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
05/10/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Attorney Knaak replied it is ultimately the Judge's call but this is something, if there is a <br /> policy which is thought out and interested parties are being solicited, it takes it off the Judge's <br /> desk. He stated he was certain there wouldn't be any pushback on it. He felt if they make that <br /> request, it will probably be gratefully received. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove replied she was okay with that. <br /> Administrative Services Director Lasher gave a scenario of three terms that are about to expire, all <br /> three incumbents want to be reappointed so there would be zero vacant seats once the Judge makes <br /> those appointments. She asked if, at that point, would she proceed with the annual recruitment <br /> that would go in the November/December issue of the Ramsey Resident or would that be omitted. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley asked if they had already agreed it would be omitted. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if they wouldn't be statutorily required to have some sort of <br /> posting regardless if the incumbents choose to retain their seats. <br /> City Attorney Knaak suggested they leave it posted and if they get interest in it, even if there is <br /> someone, then they have choices between the incumbent and someone new and it could be <br /> forwarded at the same time. <br /> Mayor Pro Tem Riley asked City Attorney Knaak if it was a legal opinion he was giving. <br /> City Attorney Knaak replied that is a recommendation yes, a legal opinion, as this is all just a <br /> matter of reading that statute. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove stated she thought that is a good idea because they have, as a part of <br /> the policy, what they do if there is a vacancy and they are drawing back on the potential <br /> applications. She agreed that it should be official even though it is there passively all year round. <br /> City Attorney Knaak commented he was aware of situations in other cities where there have been <br /> people who have come in, and in none of those cases has he seen an incumbent removed. He <br /> stated he has seen situations where people have contacted the court and asked to be considered. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented he thought they can post and lightly promote but <br /> advertising dollars wouldn't have to be spent on things such as Facebook ads. He thought it was <br /> a passive post. He appreciated the fact that it is one more thing for the City to talk about for <br /> engagement. He felt getting people involved is something they should be doing whenever they <br /> could. <br /> Mayor Kuzma commented he thought the policy would be posted. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff commented he thought Mayor Kuzma was asking if there was <br /> consensus to post it. <br /> City Council Work Session/May 10, 2022 <br /> Page 14 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.