My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 10/11/2005
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2005
>
Minutes - Council - 10/11/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 1:56:06 PM
Creation date
10/25/2005 2:37:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
10/11/2005
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
developer in thc future. He advised the preliminary plat generally conforms to the Town Center <br />master plan and standards established in the TC-1 District, therefore staff is recommending <br />approwfl contingent upon compliance with the City Staff Review Letter dated October 6, 2005. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon indicated Sharp and Associates has submitted a site <br />plan t() c(mstruct a three-story, 51,829-square foot office/retail building on a portion of Outlet W <br />in Ramscy Town Center Addition. The building represents the first of three office/retail <br />buildings on thin block. The proposed lot is approximately 4.09 acres in size, and is located <br />within thc Town Center subdistrict TC-1. The proposed office/retail building is a permitted use <br />within this district. City Code requires a Floor Area Ratio (FAR) of 1.0 in the TC-1 District. On <br />this lmrticular lot, the FAR requirement equates to a minimum 177,763 square feet of FAR. The <br />sii. c plan proposes 51,829 square feet of office area, for a FAR of 0.3. The final FAR for the <br />c~tire site will need to be calculated when site plans are submitted for the remaining two <br />buildings on thc site. He explained there have been struggles with the FAR on other <br />developments, and there will be other sites where there will be a struggle as well; it has been <br />son]cwhat difficult to meet the FAR standards, and the City may need to be flexible with these <br />standards. Thc Planning Commission recognized the problem, and had a couple of thoughts. <br />()nc was to amend the ordinance, and the other was to set up a variance procedure. The Planning <br />Commission likes the greenspace Mr. Deal has provided along Sunwood Drive, and recognized <br />that there may be tradeoffs in relation to the FAR. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the Town Center Zoning District <br />establishes setback standards based on the principle of "build to" lines rather than traditional <br />setbacks. Thc only setback requirement in the TC-1 District is in the front yard, where buildings <br />must bc within 0-5 feet of the property line. At least 60% of the front fagade must meet this <br />setback. On the proposed site plan, approximately 65% of the front fagade is meeting this <br />rcq~irement. The TC-1 District requires buildings to be 2-5 stories in height. The site plan is <br />proposing a three-story office building. He advised the grading, drainage, and utility plans will <br />need to bc revised in accordance with the City Staff Review Letter. Staff received a revised <br />Grading and Drainage Plan on October 6, 2005. Included in the Council's packet are <br />linginccring Memos dated October 6 and 11, 2005. Any motions should be contingent on these <br />n-,cmos. Parking in the first phase will meet the parking requirements of the Town Center <br />Zoning l)istrict. <br /> <br />Community Devclopment Director Trudgeon stated the Town Center Technical Advisory <br />Committee (TCTAC) reviewed the proposed site plan according to the Town Center <br />Development Guidelines. The TCTAC was generally supportive of the proposed site plan. A <br />recommendation was made to use a material other than stucco for the base of the building; <br />however, this was an incorrect reflection of the materials, as the material is not stucco. He <br />advised thc Planning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary site plan. He <br />explained the applicant is requesting permission from the City Council to begin footings and <br />founclati(~n work on the site prior to receiving final site plan approval. Staff is supportive of this <br />rcqucst, contingent on submittal of a revised grading and drainage plan that is acceptable to the <br />[~nginccring Department. <br /> <br />City Council / October 11, 2005 <br /> Page 6 of 17 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.