Laserfiche WebLink
Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Peters, to table the requested <br /> action, directing the applicant to research a one-way bus only access from Variolite,provide more <br /> Information on a noise study, and provide more information on stormwater plans. <br /> Further discussion <br /> Gar VanSco , 5 851 147 h <br /> y y Lane NW, stated that there has been a lot of discussion about an <br /> entrance fi•om Variolite. He commented that there is about three feet of right of way on the west <br /> side of Variolite and therefore does not see how a right-in/right-out entrance could be provided. <br /> He commented that in that area there is also an eight to ten feet drop therefore there would be <br /> significant difficulties in that option. Commissioner Anderson stated that he would only request <br /> that to be a right-in access. Commissioner walker commented that in that scenario the buses <br /> would still use 161 s'to exit the site. Commissioner walker commented that he would support a <br /> right-in/right-out. Commissioner Anderson commented that he is unsure there is room for that, <br /> but he would also support that. Councilmember woestehoff stated that he understands the desireV. <br /> for a right-in/right-out, there would not be buses coming from the north, most would come frorn <br /> the south. He stated that he did not like the idea of an access on Variolite but also does not like it <br /> without the Variolite access. He commented that Brookside is a good example of where buses and <br /> vehicle traffic go but recognized that there will always be backups. He stated that the Commission <br /> should continue to find the best ways to mitigate those issues. He commented that neither are good '= <br /> solutions and therefore would rely on engineers to make those decisions. Commissioner walker <br /> asked if anyone could tell him the plans for 161'. City Engineer westby stated that they have <br /> collected topography of the corridor and are processing that data to develop their plans with a trail <br /> and determine if trees could be saved. He noted that staff will be bringing those plans to the City <br /> Council to determine if the project should be moved forward one year. Commissioner walker <br /> stated that if the road is going to widened,'it should occur to the north and not impact the neighbors <br /> on the south side. City Engineer westby replied that typically streets are centered in the right-of- <br /> way., He noted that the trail will be on the north side and therefore it may be difficult to take the <br /> trail and all road width from that side but staff will look into that option. Councilmember <br /> woestehoff asked if the Council would have the data on the proposed road improvements before <br /> �M <br /> final plat, as it would seem that widening would only be required if the school is developed. City <br /> Engineer westby replied that he is unsure when the final plat would be but believed that good data <br /> would be available l in the next month or'so. Senior Planner Anderson stated that based on the <br /> current motion there would be enough time. He stated that perhaps the Commission would want <br /> g p p <br /> to discuss the variance portion of the request to determine if both actions are going to be tabled or <br /> whether the variance would move forward. He commented that it would be helpful to include a <br /> date continued to within the motion. Commissioner Anderson clarified that the case would be <br /> tabled to the next meeting. <br /> Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Acting Chairperson Gengler, Commissioners Anderson, Peters, <br /> 1 <br /> Hunt, and walker. Voting No: None. Absent: Chairperson Bauer and Commissioner VanScoy. <br /> Motion by Commissioner Anderson, seconded by Commissioner Hunt,to approve the Variance to <br /> the Park ing/Maneuvering Area Setback from Residentially zoned Land. <br /> s: <br /> Planning Commission/May 26,2022 <br /> Page 16 of 20 <br /> i <br /> I <br /> f <br />