My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 06/21/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2022
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 06/21/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:51:01 PM
Creation date
7/22/2022 8:43:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
06/21/2022
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Councilmember Woestehoff stated that it is nice that staff has been helpful even though this does <br /> not appear to be the fault of the City at any time. <br /> City Engineer Westby confirmed the consensus of the Committee, directing staff to pursue a less <br /> costly option. <br /> 5.03: Consider Recommending City Council Approving Plans and Specifications and <br /> Authorizing Advertisement for Bids for Autumn Heights Street Reconstructions, <br /> Improvement Project #22-02 <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek reviewed the staff report and recommendation to recommend that the <br /> City Council approve plans and specifications and authorize advertisement for bids for Autumn <br /> Heights Street Reconstructions, Improvement Project#22-02. Alternatively, the Committee could <br /> recommend revising the plans to include the "reclamation light" design at an estimated 43 percent <br /> cost savings, however, these streets would then have a different design than all other recently <br /> reconstructed streets in Ramsey which would provide a lesser pavement design strength and <br /> shorter design life. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked for clarification on the eight feet of existing driveways <br /> mentioned in the report. She also asked whether there is a need for curb and gutter or whether that <br /> is just needed on one section. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that 167th west of Armstrong goes uphill and turns left. He <br /> stated that the drainage along the hill goes to the ditches as there are no swales. He stated that curb <br /> and gutter would be added to that section to manage that drainage and keep soil from spilling into <br /> the road. He stated that the eight feet of driveways provides enough space to tie into the new <br /> pavement. He stated that over time parts of the road sink or raise and therefore space is needed to <br /> recreate the profile, which will cause some driveways to be slightly adjusted as well. <br /> Councilmember Musgrove asked if the curb and gutter is only in that section. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek confirmed that the curb and gutter is only along that portion of 167`h <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked how a reclamation and overlay would differ. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek replied that an overlay would mill out the top layer, but reflective <br /> cracking still occurs. He stated that there is a lot of alligator cracking on the road, which would <br /> cause the overlay to break up. He stated that a reclaim will mill off additional material to create <br /> new class five material. <br /> Councilmember Woestehoff asked if they could do that without doing a full depth reclamation, <br /> specifically asking for more explanation on the reclamation light option. <br /> Civil Engineer II Feriancek stated that the reclaim light would mill off the top and a little into the <br /> gravel. <br /> Public Works Committee/June 21, 2022 <br /> Page 5 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.