Laserfiche WebLink
Councilmember Musgrove asked City Engineer Westby and Mr. Orcutt to talk about the specs and <br />the plan coverage for dollars, if it would be covered by the project dollars or are some of the plans <br />and specs included in the $700-$900 amount. <br /> <br />Mr. Orcutt replied there will be an increase because either way that had to get designed into the <br />project. He stated he thought there would be an extra cost for that but as long as they can make it <br />eligible, they will put it into the design costs because they have funds specifically for design. If <br />they can show it was being done to benefit the public it should be eligible. He stated there will be <br />some coordination with Mr. Lonnes and his team so there will be additional costs. He stated the <br />City is being asked to do something so he thought it was fair that the County does something also. <br /> <br />Mayor Kuzma asked if there was Council consensus to go with option two. <br /> <br />Councilmember Musgrove asked City Engineer Westby if he had any concerns with the specs. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby replied he didn’t have any concerns and thought it made sense to use the <br />second approach. He stated he had every confidence they will work through it. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht referenced the map attached to the case and asked if it is going to be in <br />Anoka or if it is just the round-about at the end or if it is the whole section. <br /> <br />City Administrator Hagen explained where the City boundary was. <br /> <br />The consensus of the Council was to go with option two. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby commented they will come back with an agreement and have Council <br />approve that. <br /> <br />Mr. Orcutt assured them they won’t pay for any work done in Anoka, they will make sure <br />everything gets taken care of. He stated what they should come back with is a JPA for City <br />Engineer Westby to sign off on. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley asked City Engineer Westby if Council will be talking about the utilities <br />and how they are going in. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby asked what the timeline was to have the plans approved and out for bids. <br /> <br />Mr. Lonnes replied he thought they were talking winter. <br /> <br />City Engineer Westby commented they have time. He stated if Council would be open to it they <br />could work with Public Works to open a case and run it through the Public Works Committee to <br />have a recommendation to Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley commented he would prefer that. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / June 28, 2022 <br />Page 5 of 20 <br /> <br />