Laserfiche WebLink
technologies, such as copper and other outdated technologies, to be deemed presumptively <br />unreliable. <br />Other commenters supported the interim final rule's approach on eligible areas for <br />investment or suggested tightening eligibility even further. They argued that higher speed <br />thresholds beyond 25/3 Mbps would likely lead to investments in or building of new broadband <br />infrastructure in areas already served by broadband at speeds these commenters considered <br />sufficient; these areas, commenters suggested, are less in need of federal assistance and <br />permitting investments here could divert funding away from rural areas to more densely <br />populated areas. <br />Treasury Response: The final rule expands eligible areas for investment by requiring <br />recipients to invest in projects designed to provide service to households and businesses with an <br />identified need for additional broadband infrastructure investment. Recipients have flexibility to <br />identify a need for additional broadband infrastructure investment: examples of need include lack <br />of access to a connection that reliably meets or exceeds symmetrical 100 Mbps download and <br />upload speeds, lack of affordable access to broadband service, or lack of reliable broadband <br />service. Recipients are encouraged to prioritize projects that are designed to provide service to <br />locations not currently served by a wireline connection that reliably delivers at least 100 Mbps of <br />download speed and 20 Mbps of upload speed, as many commenters indicated that those without <br />such service constitute hard -to -reach areas in need of subsidized broadband deployment. <br />Households and businesses with an identified need for additional broadband <br />infrastructure investment do not have to be the only ones in the service area served by an eligible <br />broadband infrastructure project. Indeed, serving these households and businesses may require a <br />302 <br />