My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2022
>
Agenda - Council - 09/13/2022
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2025 2:38:06 PM
Creation date
9/27/2022 9:03:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
09/13/2022
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
883
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
offer broadband at a given speed is not dispositive. <br />Build -to Speed Standards <br />The interim final rule provided that a recipient may use funds to make investments in <br />broadband infrastructure that is designed to, upon completion, reliably meet or exceed <br />symmetrical 100 Mbps download and upload speeds. In cases where it is not practicable, because <br />of the excessive cost of the project or the geography or topography of the area to be served by <br />the project, eligible projects may be designed to reliably meet or exceed 100 Mbps download <br />speed and between at least 20 Mbps and 100 Mbps upload speed, so long as it is scalable to a <br />minimum of 100 Mbps download speed and 100 Mbps upload speed. Relatedly, Treasury in the <br />Supplementary Information to the interim final rule encouraged recipients to prioritize <br />investments in fiber-optic infrastructure wherever feasible and to prioritize projects that achieve <br />last -mile connections. <br />Public Comment: Many commenters discussed the advantages of setting minimum <br />symmetrical download and upload speeds of reliable 100 Mbps as the speed threshold for new <br />projects. Some commenters indicated support for the interim final rule's standard as it takes into <br />account growing demands on internet use resulting from pandemic broadband usage and <br />suggested that such a standard will help to ensure that networks built with SLFRF funds remain <br />valuable for years to come, even as demands continue to accelerate, particularly on upload <br />speeds. Some also indicated that the interim final rule standard has the effect of prioritizing the <br />use of fiber-optic infrastructure to deliver such speeds, which some noted was a "gold standard" <br />future -proof technology, although some commenters noted that other technologies like fixed <br />wireless have been shown to deliver such speeds in certain circumstances. <br />304 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.