Laserfiche WebLink
should include changes that were made prior to the covered period but that phase -in during the <br />covered period. <br />Treasury Response: As discussed above, the offset provision is triggered by a reduction <br />in net tax revenue resulting from "a change in law, regulation, or administrative interpretation" <br />made during the covered period. Consistent with the statutory text, "covered change" is defined <br />to include any final legislative or regulatory action, a new or changed administrative <br />interpretation, and the phase -in or taking effect of any statute or rule where the phase -in or taking <br />effect was not prescribed prior to the start of the covered period. <br />Conformity. <br />Public Comment: A number of commenters requested clarification on the scope of <br />covered changes. Specifically, several commenters requested clarification on the scope of <br />changes that would be considered as conforming to recent changes in federal law. These <br />commenters requested that Treasury clarify whether actions to selectively conform with federal <br />law would be considered covered changes and requested clarification regarding the extent to <br />which changes would be considered "recent." For example, these commenters requested <br />clarification regarding conformance with the Global Intangible Low -Taxed Income provision of <br />the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Some commenters further argued that changes that selectively <br />conform or decouple from the Internal Revenue Code should be included within scope of <br />covered changes and thus subject to the offset provision. <br />Treasury Response: The final rule maintains the treatment of changes that simply <br />conform with recent changes in federal law, such as those to conform to recent changes in <br />federal taxation of unemployment insurance benefits and taxation of loan forgiveness under the <br />325 <br />